title: [Is osteosynthesis justified for spinal injuries in children?].
abstract: The legitimacy of osteosynthesis for the treatment of spinal injuries in children is analyzed as a function of results in 10 cases, 7 affecting the cervical, 2 the thoracic and one the lumbar region, six of the children being under 10 years of age. Five of these children had serious neurologic disorders, including 4 with high tetraplegia. Technical difficulties of osteosynthesis were not made easier by the poorly adapted nature of the material for infantile statures. Indications for this surgery were not only those cases not improved by orthopedic therapy: instability of lesions, the child's condition and deterioration in the neurologic state can also require initial treatment by osteosynthesis. The principal complication is postoperative cervical kyphosis, but this can be prevented by early active reeducation, the stability of the fixation dispensing with the need for external contention.
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007738:Kyphosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D013124:Spinal Injuries / Q000601:surgery*
vernacular_title: L'ostéosynthèse est-elle légitime en pathologie rachidienne traumatique chez l'enfant?