Temporal processing in deaf signers.
The auditory and visual modalities differ in their capacities for temporal analysis, and speech relies on more rapid temporal contrasts than does sign language. We examined whether congenitally deaf signers show enhanced or diminished capacities for processing rapidly varying visual signals in light of the differences in sensory and language experience of deaf and hearing individuals. Four experiments compared rapid temporal analysis in deaf signers and hearing subjects at three different levels: sensation, perception, and memory. Experiment 1 measured critical flicker frequency thresholds and Experiment 2, two-point thresholds to a flashing light. Experiments 3-4 investigated perception and memory for the temporal order of rapidly varying nonlinguistic visual forms. In contrast to certain previous studies, specifically those investigating the effects of short-term sensory deprivation, no significant differences between deaf and hearing subjects were found at any level. Deaf signers do not show diminished capacities for rapid temporal analysis, in comparison to hearing individuals. The data also suggest that the deficits in rapid temporal analysis reported previously for children with developmental language delay cannot be attributed to lack of experience with speech processing and production.
D000328:Adult; D003638:Deafness / Q000151:congenital / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D005425:Flicker Fusion; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008369:Manual Communication; D008568:Memory; D008875:Middle Aged; D011601:Psychophysics; D012683:Sensory Deprivation; D012813:Sign Language; D013998:Time Perception; D014796:Visual Perception