Assessing clinical judgment with standardized patients.
Family physicians and general practitioners see the majority of patients with uncomplicated rheumatic disease, yet information on database collection and clinical judgment in such practices is limited. Trained patients with uncomplicated rheumatic disease (standardized patients) were used to evaluate these abilities in 26 family physicians at the University of Arizona College of Medicine in blinded, but previously consented to, brief new encounters. Ability to formulate an assessment and to plan was evaluated as well as ability to collect diagnostic information. Few physicians explored the psychosocial impact of the illness (4 percent) or the role of depression (0 percent). In the brief encounter with a localized complaint, little inquiry was directed to systemic disease (46 percent). Physicians more uniformly asked about the chief complaint (96 percent) and time of onset (88 percent). Physical examination items most commonly omitted were evaluation of systemic joint involvement (69 percent) and muscle wasting in the involved area (59 percent). Referral occurred on 15 percent of encounters and patient education occurred in 62 percent. Three quarters of physicians developed an adequate assessment and virtually all developed an adequate patient care plan.
D001130:Arizona; D002983:Clinical Competence; D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008485:Medical Audit / Q000379:methods*; D008487:Medical History Taking; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D010808:Physical Examination; D012216:Rheumatic Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*