title: Echography in vena cava invasion from renal tumors.
abstract: The last 4 cases of our case series of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with caval or cavo-atrial invasion were studied by ultrasonography (US), computerized tomography (CT scan), arteriography (AG) and venocavography (VC) (inferior and/or superior). A comparison is made with these different methods, with particular emphasis on (US). The authors' conclusions are that ultrasound may replace anterograde inferior cavography in the evaluation of thrombotic extension and, in addition, it seems to be capable of eliminating the false-positives or -negatives of this method. AG and VC are no longer necessary to determine the cavo-atrial extension of a tumor thrombus from RCC when US and CT scan are available and are correctly integrated.
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000792:Angiography; D002292:Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007680:Kidney Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009361:Neoplasm Invasiveness; D009392:Nephrectomy; D010690:Phlebography; D013927:Thrombosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014682:Vena Cava, Inferior / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology