Animal cognition as the praxist views it.
The distinction between psychology and praxics provides a clear answer to the question of animal cognition. As Griffin and others have noted, the kinds of behavioral phenomena that lead psychologists to speak of cognition in humans are also observed in nonhuman animals, and therefore those who are convinced of the legitimacy of psychology should not hesitate to speak of and to attempt to study animal cognition. The behavior of organisms is also a legitimate subject matter, and praxics, the study of behavior, has led to significant advances in our understanding of the kinds of behaviors that lead psychologists to speak of cognition. Praxics is a biological science; the attempt by students of behavior to appropriate psychology has been misguided. Generativity theory is an example of a formal theory of behavior that has proved useful both in the engineering of intelligent performances in nonhuman animals and in the prediction of intelligent performances in humans.
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001525:Behavioral Sciences / Q000639:trends*; D001527:Behaviorism; D003071:Cognition; D010856:Columbidae; D049671:History, 18th Century; D049672:History, 19th Century; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011340:Problem Solving; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011584:Psychology / Q000266:history / Q000639:trends