Case history questionnaires in the study of doctors' use of resources. Are they measuring what we want?
A set of 15 self-administered case histories were developed, each consisting of a short case followed by a standard format on which desired tests were checked. After pilot testing the case histories within a group of doctors, the authors selected the ten cases with the highest item-total correlations that also provided a broad clinical spectrum. Using a different group of 19 doctors, test-ordering on the questionnaire was compared with actual test-ordering in clinical practice. Questionnaire test-ordering did not reflect practice behavior; in fact, the relationship tended to be inverse (r = -0.43: P less than 0.10). Adjusting for case-mix variation by including only those practice cases with diagnoses similar to questionnaire cases did not improve its performance (r = -0.50: P less than 0.05). These findings suggest that test-ordering on case history questionnaires may not reflect actual practice behavior. Conclusions about test-ordering behavior and management strategies to alter it should not be based on results from questionnaires that have not been validated against actual practice.
D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008131:London; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000523:psychology*; D011364:Professional Practice; D011386:Projective Techniques; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires