Application of the indirect enzyme immunoassay for the detection of antibodies against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae.
Sera from swine and rats experimentally infected with Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae and field sera from swine were investigated for antibodies against E. rhusiopathiae using the microtiter enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and, for comparison, the growth test (GT) and the agglutination test (AT). In principle there was a good correspondence between the results of EIA and those of the two other methods, but EIA and GT were more sensitive than AT. On the basis of the evaluation pattern of GT and AT on swine sera, EIA titers of 1/320 were considered as "chronic erysipelas titers". Compared with GT and AT, the EIA has some advantages: it is not influenced by contamination of the test sera, it takes only a few hours and using the microtiter system it is easy and economical to perform.
D000372:Agglutination Tests; D000818:Animals; D000907:Antibodies, Bacterial / Q000032:analysis*; D004888:Erysipelothrix / Q000254:growth & development / Q000276:immunology*; D004889:Erysipelothrix Infections / Q000175:diagnosis*; D007124:Immunoenzyme Techniques; D051381:Rats; D011919:Rats, Inbred Strains; D013552:Swine; D013554:Swine Erysipelas / Q000175:diagnosis
D000907:Antibodies, Bacterial