Efficacy of low-concentration iodophors for germicidal hand washing.
The efficacy of iodophor germicides containing different concentrations of available iodine against transient (inoculated) bacteria and the natural hand microflora was compared with chlorhexidine gluconate (2 and 4%) liquid detergent (Hibitane), non-germicidal soap and a tap water rinse. The tap water rinse was ineffective compared with all other treatments. Only 4% chlorhexidine gluconate liquid detergent and iodophor containing 0.75% available iodine were significantly better than the non-germicidal soap for reduction of transient bacteria, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens, that had been inoculated onto hands. These agents also caused a significant reduction in the number of 'natural' microorganisms released from hands after a standard 15 s hand wash. The low-concentration iodophor products and the product containing 2% chlorhexidine gluconate failed to give results significantly better than the non-germicidal control soap. Baird-Parker medium and standard aerobic plate counts were highly correlated (r = 0.82), so that for studies of Gram-negative bacteria inoculated onto hands as a transient microflora, counts on Baird-Parker medium give a reasonable indication of the natural (residual) hand microflora.
D002710:Chlorhexidine / Q000494:pharmacology; D004202:Disinfectants; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000187:drug effects; D006225:Hand; D006235:Hand Disinfection; D006801:Humans; D007455:Iodine / Q000494:pharmacology*; D007466:Iodophors / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011551:Pseudomonas fluorescens / Q000187:drug effects; D012867:Skin / Q000382:microbiology*; D012915:Soaps / Q000494:pharmacology
D004202:Disinfectants; D007466:Iodophors; D012915:Soaps; D007455:Iodine; D002710:Chlorhexidine