title: Comparison of coaxial and side-by-side double lumen subclavian catheters with the single lumen catheter.
abstract: Subclavian catheters are increasingly being used for vascular access. Many double lumen catheters (DLCs) have been designed to alleviate the need for a single-needle machine. Clinical studies comparing the safety of various DLCs with single lumen catheters (SLCs) are scarce. This study compares our experience with Sh-SLCs (Single-Shiley), Vas-DLCs (Coaxial-Vascath), and Qu-DLCs (Side-by-Side, Quinton). Similar aseptic insertion and handling techniques were used. The catheters were filled with heparin at the end of dialysis (HD) and no interdialytic infusions were given. Fifty-two Sh-SLCs were inserted in 46 patients for 253 HDs, 71 Vas-DLCs in 47 patients for 185 HDs, and 51 Qu-DLCs in 38 patients for 215 HDs. HDs/catheter were 4.9, 2.6, and 4.2, the percent incidence of septicemia was 2%, 7%, and 0%, and the catheter failure was 11%, 48%, and 16% for Sh-SLCs, Vas-DLCs, and Qu-DLCs, respectively (P less than 0.05 Vas-DLC v Sh-SLC and Qu-DLC). The poor flow problems were more frequent on the left side with Vas-DLCs (16/31) and Qu-DLCs (7/17), but not with Sh-SLCs (2/25). Other major complications were not noted. These results suggest that infections and mechanical problems may be more frequent with Vas-DLCs than Sh-SLCs and Qu-DLCs. Use of Qu-DLCs is a safe and may be preferred since a single-needle machine is not required. Insertion of a DLC on the right side may be preferred due to higher mechanical problems on the left side.
mesh_terms: D002408:Catheters, Indwelling / Q000009:adverse effects; D004868:Equipment Failure; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007239:Infections / Q000209:etiology; D011859:Radiography; D006435:Renal Dialysis; D013350:Subclavian Vein; D014683:Vena Cava, Superior / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging