Parental discretion and children's rights: background and implications for medical decision-making.
This paper argues that liberal tenets that justify intervention to promote the welfare of an incompetent do not suffice as a basis for analyzing parent-child relationships, and that this inadequacy is the basis for many of the problems that arise when thinking about the state's role in resolving family conflicts, particularly when monitoring parental discretion in medical decision-making on behalf of a child. The state may be limited by the best interest criterion when dealing with children, but parents are not. The state's relation with the child is formal while the parental relation is intimate, having its own goals and purposes. While the liberal canons insist on the incompetent one's best interest, parents are permitted to compromise the child's interest for ends related to these familial goals and purposes. Parents decisions should be supervened, in general, only if it can be shown that no responsible mode of thinking warrants such treatment of a child.
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D007603:Jurisprudence; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D008297:Male; D033242:Minors; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D033282:Parental Consent; D026706:Paternalism; D010349:Patient Compliance; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D012067:Religion; D035781:Siblings; D014019:Tissue Donors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement