Inhibition and level-tolerant frequency tuning in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat.
For echolocation the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii, emits complex orientation sounds (pulses), each consisting of four harmonics with long constant-frequency components (CF1-4) followed by short frequency-modulated components (FM1-4). The CF signals are best suited for target detection and measurement of target velocity. The CF/CF area of the auditory cortex of this species contains neurons sensitive to pulse-echo pairs. These CF/CF combination-sensitive neurons extract velocity information from Doppler-shifted echoes. In this study we electrophysiologically investigated the frequency tuning of CF/CF neurons for excitation, facilitation, and inhibition. CF1/CF2 and CF1/CF3 combination-sensitive neurons responded poorly to individual signal elements in pulse-echo pairs but showed strong facilitation of responses to pulse-echo pairs. The essential components in the pairs were CF1 of the pulse and CF2 or CF3 of the echo. In 68% of CF/CF neurons, the frequency-tuning curves for facilitation were extremely sharp for CF2 or CF3 and were "level-tolerant" so that the bandwidths of the tuning curves were less than 5.0% of best frequencies even at high stimulus levels. Facilitative tuning curves for CF1 were level tolerant only in 6% of the neurons studied. CF/CF neurons were specialized for fine analysis of the frequency relationship between two CF sounds regardless of sound pressure levels. Some CF/CF neurons responded to single-tone stimuli. Frequency-tuning curves for excitation (responses to single-tone stimuli) were extremely sharp and level tolerant for CF2 or CF3 in 59% of CF1/CF2 neurons and 70% of CF1/CF3 neurons. Tuning to CF1 was level tolerant in only 9% of these neurons. Sharp level-tolerant tuning may be the neural basis for small difference limens in frequency at high stimulus levels. Sharp level-tolerant tuning curves were sandwiched between broad inhibitory areas. Best frequencies for inhibition were slightly higher or lower than the best frequencies for facilitation and excitation. We thus conclude that sharp level-tolerant tuning curves are produced by inhibition. The extent to which neural sharpening occurred differed among groups of neurons tuned to different frequencies. The more important the frequency analysis of a particular component in biosonar signals, the more pronounced the neural sharpening. This was in addition to the peripheral specialization for fine frequency analysis of that component. The difference in bandwidth or quality factor between the excitatory tuning curves of peripheral neurons and the facilitative and excitatory tuning curves of CF/CF neurons was larger at higher stimulus levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000818:Animals; D001303:Auditory Cortex / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology*; D002685:Chiroptera / Q000502:physiology*; D004455:Echolocation; D009433:Neural Inhibition; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology