Roles and responsibilities: theoretical issues in the definition of consultation liaison psychiatry.
Central to much medical ethical analysis is the concept of the role of the physician. While this concept plays an important role in medical ethics, its function is largely tacit. The present paper attempts to bring the concept of a social role to prominence by focusing on an historically recent and rather richly contextured role, namely, that of consultation liaison psychiatry. Since my intention is primarily theoretical, I largely ignore the empirical studies which purport to develop the detailed functioning of the role. My limited intent is to draw attention to the theoretical complexity of the consultation liaison role as an example of the general relevance of role concepts to medical ethics. For this reason, consultation liaison psychiatry will function as an illustration of fundamental concepts of medical ethics rather than as a subject of analysis in its own right. Similarly, the concept of the social role will be developed only as is necessary to explore the general relationship between the consultation liaison role and ethical analysis.
D001318:Authoritarianism; D003219:Confidentiality; D032982:Contracts; D028663:Ethical Theory; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D028681:Moral Obligations; D026706:Paternalism; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011570:Psychiatry; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012380:Role; D012919:Social Behavior; D012941:Social Responsibility