Euthanasia--again. "Letting die" is not in the patient's best interests: a case for active euthanasia.
Recent discussions in the Journal on the subject of euthanasia have relied on intuitive appeals to distinctions traditionally considered to be morally relevant, such as the distinction between acts and omissions (or killing and letting die), or ordinary and extraordinary means of treatment. These discussions remained inconclusive. However, the question of euthanasia no longer remains inconclusive if one adopts the perspective suggested by the United States President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research and by the World Medical Assembly--that a doctor should act in his or her patient's best interests. From this vantage point, it is argued, there will be instances when active euthanasia is the proper cause of action.
D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005065:Euthanasia; D028601:Euthanasia, Active; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D008020:Life Support Care; D018579:Patient Selection; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D013727:Terminal Care; D028761:Withholding Treatment