Additivity of simultaneous masking, revisited.
Lutfi [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 262-267 (1983)] compared simultaneous masking functions (signal threshold versus masker level) for individual sinusoidal and narrow-band noise maskers, and for those maskers presented in pairs. Lutfi found that the pairs of maskers produced 10-17 dB "excess" masking over that predicted from the linear sum of their individual masking and explained the results in terms of a model in which the effects of the maskers are summed after undergoing independent compressive transformations. This paper describes experiments similar to those of Lutfi, and presents evidence suggesting that Lutfi's results may have been influenced by two factors: (1) combination-product detection, and (2) the use of different detection cues for single maskers and for pairs of maskers. Experiment I showed that when the stimulus conditions were chosen so as to minimize the likelihood of combination-product detection, "excess" masking was only 3-5 dB. Experiment II supported the idea that for a single narrow-band noise masker, subjects make use of the relatively slow envelope fluctuations to enhance performance. When two independent narrow-band noise maskers are added, the effectiveness of this cue is reduced, and between 3 and 9 dB of "excess" masking occurs. When the two noises are derived from the same source, and have correlated envelope fluctuations, no "excess" masking occurs. The results indicate that Lufti's compressive-nonlinearity model clearly fails in some situations.
D001309:Auditory Threshold; D006801:Humans; D008144:Loudness Perception; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D010898:Pitch Perception; D011571:Psychoacoustics