Ethics of clinical trials in family medicine.
In this paper several issues are examined that arise from conducting randomized clinical trials in a family practice setting. The distinctive research tradition in family practice involves a patient's primary care physician performing an experimental investigation that usually, though not invariably, is focused on common health problems. Representative clinical trials are presented as examples that illustrate two ethical difficulties evoked by such research: a potential violation of the primary care physician's therapeutic imperative to provide the best possible treatment for his or her patient, and the likelihood that the type of physician-patient relationship fostered in family practice significantly diminishes the capacity of the patient to give true informed consent. In an attempt to resolve these ethical difficulties, a model of moral reasoning is presented that is based on easily understood ethical principles and is applicable to actual clinical decision making. Using that model, a tentative set of rules or guidelines is offered for implementing clinical trials in family medicine.
D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009014:Morals; D010146:Pain / Q000188:drug therapy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011897:Random Allocation; D012008:Recurrence; D012107:Research Design; D012459:Salicylates / Q000627:therapeutic use; D014552:Urinary Tract Infections / Q000517:prevention & control
D012459:Salicylates