Identification and its vicissitudes.
This paper attempts to understand the vicissitudes of identification within the co-ordinates of narcissism and the object relation. Firstly the dialectic pair primary identification/secondary identification are studied, and primary narcissism is suggested as the hypothesis which best explains them. The complex identification processes in the primary scene are considered next and the importance of the introjection of the oedipal parents for the formation of the superego is underlined. The importance of the structuring function of the introjection and projection mechanisms becomes embodied in the concept of projective identification, which comes to question the postulate of primary narcissism. The theory of projective-introjective identification is an extremely powerful instrument for explaining phenomena, however it obliges one to accept that the first introjections are radically different from the others. They have nothing to do with mourning but rather with primitive mechanisms which question the subject/object polarity and, so this author believes, spring basically from envy. Lastly, it is maintained that envy and libido are factors of a dialectic from which the object relation and the earliest processes of identification, previous to the Oedipus complex, proceed at one and the same time.
D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D004532:Ego; D005619:Freudian Theory; D006117:Grief; D006801:Humans; D007062:Identification, Psychological; D007100:Imitative Behavior; D007578:Jealousy; D009289:Narcissism; D009769:Object Attachment; D009813:Oedipus Complex; D011385:Projection; D011572:Psychoanalysis / Q000266:history*; D011574:Psychoanalytic Theory; D013475:Superego