The distribution of monosynaptic connexions from inspiratory bulbospinal neurones to inspiratory motoneurones in the cat.
Monosynaptic connexions were sought between bulbospinal inspiratory neurones and inspiratory motoneurones of the C5 phrenic nerve or the intercostal nerves of up to six segments in the anaesthetized cat; they were identified by the presence of narrow peaks in cross-correlation histograms constructed from the spontaneous discharges of these neurones. About half of the bulbospinal neurones tested with the phrenic gave a monosynaptic connexion, as did just under half of those tested with the intercostal nerves. Some neurones gave connexions to both. For pairs of bulbospinal neurones and intercostal nerves, connexions were seen in 50 out of 295 instances (17%). No evidence was found of systematic patterns of connexions to different segments. Some neurones gave connexions to adjacent segments, others up to five segments apart. Bulbospinal neurones were not equipotent at giving connexions to the intercostal motoneurones. If a neurone gave a connexion to one segment, it was more likely to give connexion to another segment than chance would predict. The neurones with strong connexions were concentrated rostral to obex in the ventral respiratory group; neurones in both the caudal part of the ventral group and in the dorsal group gave weaker connexions. Regional variation within the medulla in the proportions of neurones giving connexions to the phrenic motoneurones was not seen, in particular neurones of the dorsal group (eight out of sixteen) and the ventral group (five out of eleven) were equipotent. When the strength of the connexions was assessed by k, the ratio of the peak count in the cross-correlation histogram to the base-line count, the mean strength was similar for the peaks seen for the phrenic (k = 1.113) and the intercostal (k = 1.114) motoneurones. However, because, on a segment-by-segment basis, fewer connexions were seen for the intercostals, the over-all mean value of k (absence of a narrow peak taken as k = 1.0) was stronger for the phrenic (k = 1.055) than for the intercostals (k = 1.019). For the phrenic, the apparent strength of connexion (assessed by k) was considerably stronger for the motoneurones giving large spikes than for those giving small ones. The same result was probably also true for the intercostals. With several assumptions, the total depolarization during inspiration derived monosynaptically in phrenic or intercostal motoneurones was calculated and found to be low, about 1 mV for the intercostals and 3-4 mV for the phrenic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
D000200:Action Potentials; D000768:Anesthesia, General; D000818:Animals; D001369:Axons / Q000502:physiology; D002415:Cats; D005260:Female; D007367:Intercostal Nerves / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008526:Medulla Oblongata / Q000166:cytology*; D009046:Motor Neurons / Q000502:physiology; D009431:Neural Conduction; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D010791:Phrenic Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D012119:Respiration; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology; D013900:Thoracic Nerves / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors