The composition and physicochemical properties of hyaluronic acids prepared from ox synovial fluid and from a case of mesothelioma.
1. Materials containing hyaluronic acid have been prepared by filtration (Ogston & Stanier, 1950) from ox synovial fluid and from a protein-rich human mesothelioma fluid. The ox material has been deproteinized by treatment with chloroform and pentanol and by gradient elution on DEAE-Sephadex; several fractions were obtained by the latter method. These materials can be stored in solution at -20 degrees without change of properties. The ox material contained 21% of protein; all other preparations contained less than 6% of protein. 2. The two materials have been compared by sedimentation and viscosity and shown to be closely similar. Treatment of the ox material with neuraminidase caused no change in its viscosity behaviour. 3. Information about the molecular configuration of the ox material has been obtained from measurements of light-scattering and viscosity. The results, though consistent with a highly extended configuration, are not consistent with a linear random-coil configuration. It is tentatively suggested that the structure may have some degree of branching and of cross-linking, which give it a rigidity with respect to expansion of the molecular domain that would not be possessed by a random coil. 4. The deproteinized material recovered from DEAE-Sephadex, though polydisperse, showed unchanged average molecular weight; however, the average radius of gyration was greater than before this treatment. 5. Acidification to approx. pH3 resulted in a contraction of the structure, with only a slight degree of expansion when the pH was restored to 6.8-7.0. 6. Measurements of optical rotatory dispersion qualitatively support a structure less simple than a linear random coil. 7. Colloid osmotic pressures of mixed solutions of bovine serum albumin and of hyaluronic acid prepared by filtration from ox synovial fluid have been measured. The results agree approximately with those of Laurent & Ogston (1963) but are in quantitative disagreement with the partition measurements of Ogston & Phelps (1960). The relationships between thermodynamic quantities in a quaternary system of electrolytes are discussed in Appendix 2. 8. Refractometric measurements have been made in connexion with light-scattering measurements, as the basis for a convenient method of determining the concentrations of solutions of hyaluronic acids, and to measure the partition of sodium chloride in dialysis experiments. The theory of the last use is discussed in Appendix 1. 9. Sedimentation measurements on the ox preparation have been made up to a concentration of 1.4x10(-2)g./ml. The form of the sedimentation coefficient-concentration relationship is discussed. The value of the sedimentation coefficient at higher concentration is the basis of an illustration of the likely effect of hyaluronic acid on the flow of water through narrow channels in connective tissue. 10. Available colorimetric methods have been shown to give low estimates for glucuronic acid when applied to highly polymerized materials, as compared with estimates by decarboxylation. A spectrophotometric titration with cetylpyridinium bromide has been shown to give estimates of carboxyl groups that agree well with those of decarboxylation when applied to preparations of hyaluronic acid under suitable conditions; the results are not affected by the presence of protein. 11. Estimates of glucosamine (Ogston, 1964) have been found to be low compared with those of total acetyl, independently of the presence of protein. The magnitude of the discrepancy is characteristically different for preparations from ox synovial fluid and from mesothelioma. 12. Sialic acid was estimated in several preparations. It is likely that this forms part of the protein. 13. Analyses of preparations for total nitrogen, amino acids, total acetyl, glucuronic acid (by decarboxylation) and ash account for at least 95.7% of the dry weight in terms of N-acetylglucosaminyl, glucuronyl, protein and metal ions. Previously published analyses of hyaluronic acids are reviewed. 14. The estimated molar ratios of glucuronic acid to glucosamine were all significantly greater than unity. 15. The analytical results are interpreted as agreeing with the physicochemical measurements in suggesting a more complex structure, for at least some hyaluronic acids, than that of an alternate linear copolymer in random-coil configuration.
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D055598:Chemical Phenomena; D002627:Chemistry, Physical; D003956:Dialysis; D005122:Exudates and Transudates; D005965:Glucuronates; D006801:Humans; D006820:Hyaluronic Acid; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008654:Mesothelioma; D012710:Serum Albumin, Bovine; D012965:Sodium Chloride; D012996:Solutions; D013500:Surface Tension; D013582:Synovial Fluid; D014783:Viscosity
D005965:Glucuronates; D012996:Solutions; D012710:Serum Albumin, Bovine; D012965:Sodium Chloride; D006820:Hyaluronic Acid
J Biol Chem. 1954 Dec;211(2):717-24
13221577
Biochem J. 1955 Dec;61(4):688-97
13276356
Biochem J. 1960 Jul;76:124-32
13822561
Biochem J. 1953 Jan;53(1):4-7
13032021
Biochem Soc Symp. 1961;20:51-79
13742759
Biochem J. 1963 Nov;89:249-53
14084608
Physiol Rev. 1953 Jul;33(3):387-423
13088295
Br J Exp Pathol. 1960 Aug;41:422-9
13799168
Clin Chim Acta. 1960 Jul;5:477-81
13690649
Biochem J. 1961 Apr;78:827-33
13730460
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1958 Mar;27(3):453-6
13535624
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1960 Aug 26;42:476-85
13759521
Biochem J. 1960 Jan;74(1):27-38
16748809
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953 Jul;83(3):461-2
13088877
Biochem J. 1942 Dec;36(10-12):790-1
16747508
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Mar 5;69:453-8
14025349
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1956 Sep;21(3):506-18
13363957
J Biol Chem. 1953 Jul;203(1):213-25
13069506
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1960 Aug;89:157-9
13851710
Biochem J. 1951 Oct;49(5):591-2
14886350
Biochem J. 1964 Oct;93(1):106-12
4158275
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 May 13;49:258-64
13759520
J Biol Chem. 1953 Nov;205(1):205-11
13117898
Biochem J. 1956 Feb;62(2):304-14
13293189
Anal Biochem. 1962 Oct;4:330-4
13971270
J Physiol. 1953 Feb 27;119(2-3):244-52
13035748
Fed Proc. 1958 Dec;17(4):1086-93
13619778
Biochem J. 1952 Sep;52(1):149-56
13018180
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Sep 30;52:435-40
14466263
Biochem J. 1957 Nov;67(3):431-5
13479400
J Biol Chem. 1955 Sep;216(1):263-71
13252026
Biochem J. 1944;38(5):413-7
16747826
Biochem J. 1958 Sep;70(1):1-4
13584292
Biochem J. 1950 Mar;46(3):364-76
16748691
J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:67-74
13730461
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Mar 5;69:544-51
13972776
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1952 Jul;38:49-53
12997078
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1960 Jan;8:29-36
14413258
Adv Protein Chem. 1961;16:401-544
13995485
Biochem J. 1958 Oct;70(2):236-44
13584330
Anal Biochem. 1964 Jul;8:337-43
14213996
J Clin Invest. 1955 Sep;34(9):1454-61
13252093
Nature. 1960 Dec 31;188:1194-5
13710997
Biochem J. 1951 Oct;49(5):585-90
14886349
Biochem J. 1961 Nov;81:384-92
13860975
Biochem J. 1933;27(6):1824-8
16745305
Biochem J. 1963 May;87(2):396-402
16749009