title: [Value of angiography and echotomography in injuries of the spleen].
abstract: In all the patients was performed angiography, while only 11 were studied by the means of Abdominal Ultrasonography. The Authors' aim is to evaluate the accuracy of these two methods and to define a correct diagnostic procedure. The results obtained with Angiography were 15 correct diagnosis and 1 false positive, whereas those obtained with Sonography were 7 correct diagnosis, 2 indicative diagnosis and 2 false negative. Therefore, when a patient is clinically suspected of having a traumatic spleen injury, the Authors suggest to perform an Abdominal Sonography at first. In case of evident spleen lesion, laparatomy will be directly carried out. However, if the sonographic result is negative or aspecific, it will be necessary for the patient to undergo Angiography in order to rule out possible false negative or establish the origin of endoabdominal bleeding correctly.
mesh_terms: D000792:Angiography; D006406:Hematoma / Q000175:diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D013154:Spleen / Q000293:injuries*; D013159:Splenic Infarction / Q000175:diagnosis; D013161:Splenic Rupture / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014054:Tomography / Q000379:methods; D014463:Ultrasonography
vernacular_title: Valore dell'angiografia e dell'ecotomografia nei traumatismi della milza.