The apical seal via the retrosurgical approach. II. An evaluation of retrofilling materials.
In this investigation heat-sealed gutta-percha (A) reinforced with Adaptic (B), ASPA (C), Cupralloy without (D) and with (E) varnish, Spheraloy without (F) and with (G) varnish were used as retrofilling materials. Seventy maxillary central incisors with Class I canal anatomy were selected. Marginal leakage at the apical filling/root canal interface was evaluated quantitatively by means of a fluorescent dye technique. All statistical tests were computed at the 5 percent level of significance. Analysis of variance revealed that differences in microleakage among retrofillings were significant. Tukey's test of multiple contrasts was used to isolate statistically significant differences between all pairs of means. The following results were obtained: D F A G E C B Retrofillings are ranked in descending order of microleakage. Means that are linked were not significantly different.
D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D003722:Dental Alloys; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003736:Dental Cavity Lining; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006171:Gutta-Percha; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D012184:Retrograde Obturation / Q000379:methods*; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials / Q000008:administration & dosage
D003722:Dental Alloys; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D006171:Gutta-Percha