Sensitivity and efficiency of four immunohistochemical methods as defined by staining of artificial sections.
Direct (DIF) and indirect (IIF) immunofluorescence, indirect immunoperoxidase conjugate (IPC) and unlabelled antibody peroxidase antiperoxidase (PAP) staining was performed on sections of artificial substrate containing different concentrations of human immunoglobulin (Ig)A or IgG. Detection sensitivity, in terms of the lowest amount of discernible antigen, was evaluated by direct microscopy and by microphotometry. Staining efficiency (signal-to-noise ratio) was evaluated by microphotometry. Only minor differences in antigen detection sensitivity were found when IPC and PAP were compared with DIF and IIF under appropriate conditions. The sensitivity of DIF was only marginally improved by raised conjugate concentration and prolonged incubation time. Microphotometry of DIF on ethanol-fixed IgA substrate revealed that the staining intensity increased proportionally with the antigen concentration whereas on formaldehyde-fixed substrate a progressive masking of the antigen was indicated which, however, could be overcome by applying raised conjugate concentration and prolonged incubation time. Such antigenic self masking was of relatively little importance to IPC and PAP staining, probably because of the inherent amplification in these methods. An additional masking effect due to extraneous protein was revealed by DIF when ethanol-fixed sections had been soaked in bovine serum albumin and postfixed with formaldehyde; unmasking was achieved by proteolytic treatment of the sections.
D000941:Antigens / Q000032:analysis*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005455:Fluorescent Antibody Technique; D007124:Immunoenzyme Techniques; D007070:Immunoglobulin A / Q000032:analysis; D007074:Immunoglobulin G / Q000032:analysis; D013194:Staining and Labeling
D000941:Antigens; D007070:Immunoglobulin A; D007074:Immunoglobulin G