Does rate of processing determine ease of target detection?
In a complex target identification task, Krumhansl (1982) reported that ease of target detection was inversely related to the exposure duration of contextual elements in the display. This relationship held at brief exposures of the contextual elements. However, in Krumhansl's design, brightness and duration covaried. Hence, the results cannot be ascribed unambiguously to the effect of duration alone. In the present two experiments, brightness and duration were varied independently. The outcome showed that brightness differences were both a necessary and a sufficient condition for producing the relationships observed by Krumhansl. In fact, when brightness was equalized across all durations the relationship was reversed. Although unable to account for the effects of duration, Krumhansl's formal model remains viable as a predictor of the effects of brightness.
D001288:Attention; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005260:Female; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011930:Reaction Time