Relative efficiency of techniques for detecting avian reticuloendotheliosis virus as a vaccine contaminant.
Three techniques were compared for sensitivity in detecting reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) in a deliberately contaminated Marek's disease vaccine. The most sensitive and rapid test was the indirect fluorescent antibody test (FAT). The indirect immunoperoxidase test, although simple to perform and only marginally less sensitive than the FAT, was difficult to interpret at low levels of REV. Using immunoelectron microscopy, virions were seen only after three subcultures and then not to the same level as that detected by the FAT or immunoperoxidase test. Serum raised against the HPRS-1 strain of REV detected other strains of this virus in the FAT.
D000818:Animals; D003429:Cross Reactions; D005455:Fluorescent Antibody Technique; D006564:Herpesviridae / Q000276:immunology*; D007124:Immunoenzyme Techniques; D008380:Marek Disease / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008854:Microscopy, Electron; D011201:Poultry Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control*; D001356:Reticuloendotheliosis virus / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D012190:Retroviridae / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D014412:Tumor Virus Infections / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000662:veterinary; D014422:Turkeys / Q000276:immunology; D014765:Viral Vaccines
D014765:Viral Vaccines