title: Esophagotomy in the pony: comparison of surgical techniques and form of feed.
abstract: Esophageal healing was studied in 12 ponies after cervical esophagotomy. The esophagus was sutured, feed and water were withheld for 48 hours, and then all ponies were permitted to eat. In group I (n = 6), a longitudinal esophagotomy was made. In group II (n = 6), a rotational esophagotomy was made with the mucosal incision 180 degrees away from the incision in the esophageal muscle. Three ponies in each group were fed a soft diet ad libitum for 9 days, and then were allowed access to hay and grain. The remaining ponies were fed hay and grain. The esophagotomies of all hay-fed ponies dehisced and healed by second intention, whereas esophagotomies healed by first intention in the ponies given a soft diet. Endoscopic and radiographic examinations indicated that the progression of healing in the present study was a function of diet (form of food), rather than surgical technique. The cross-sectional width of the muscularis externa at the incision site was 39.6% greater in mash-fed ponies than in hay-fed ponies. Based on density-dependent image analysis, average elastin content and reticulin fiber of the submucosa and muscularis externa at the incision were not influenced by the form of feed or surgical technique, although elastin fiber regeneration did not occur at the site of the incision.
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D002523:Edible Grain; D004947:Esophagus / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006734:Horse Diseases / Q000473:pathology; D006736:Horses / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000662:veterinary; D013529:Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Q000662:veterinary; D013536:Suture Techniques / Q000662:veterinary*; D014945:Wound Healing