title: An evaluation of Salmonella (Ames) test data in the published literature: application of statistical procedures and analysis of mutagenic potency.
abstract: We searched the published literature for Salmonella test data on some 450 chemicals. Only 137 of more than 400 articles containing original data satisfied minimum criteria for a quantitative analysis [1751 experiments, comprising data on 152 chemicals (Table 1)]. Many of these papers did not report basic information about the test protocol (Table 2). We used previously described statistical procedures (Bernstein et al., 1982) to estimate the initial slopes of the dose-response curves and corresponding standard errors. We also applied tests for significance and linear goodness-of-fit. We then used the results of these analyses to examine several issues: (1) Linearity of the low dose region of the dose-response curve. We found that the overwhelming majority of curves were linear, though ability to detect non-linearity of dose-response curves in the standard plate test is only limited. 7% of all experiments to which the goodness-of-fit test was applied were curves of increasing slope, and with a few possible exceptions, these were not obviously associated with any particular mutagens, even those generally considered to produce non-linear effects such as MNNG and EMS (Table 3). (2) Performance of the statistical test for significance. Results of the statistical test for significance of the dose-response were compared with author's opinions as to positivity. In almost all cases (94%) results of the statistical test and authors opinions were the same. In the examples of conflicting opinions, the reasons were: (a) the statistical test places more weight than do most authors on the presence of a linear dose-response; (b) most authors tend to require at least a 2-fold increase over the spontaneous background for 'significance', and (c) when the number of spontaneous revertants is small (e.g., TA1537), authors tend to require a larger increase in induced revertants than when the spontaneous background is large, whereas the statistical procedure makes no such distinction. These factors result in the statistical test tending to identify more experiments as positive than do authors, provided there is a linear dose-response, and authors tending to judge more experiments as positive when the dose-response is not linear. (3) Reproducibility. Among the 1751 experiments there were 122 data-sets (a total of 333 experiments) in which the same chemical was tested by two or more different laboratories under the same protocol. 21 of the 122 data-sets had some disagreement between experiments as to whether results were positive or negative (Table 4).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
mesh_terms: D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D009152:Mutagenicity Tests / Q000379:methods*; D009153:Mutagens; D012486:Salmonella typhimurium / Q000187:drug effects*; D013223:Statistics as Topic
chemical_list: D009153:Mutagens