Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas v. Harris: a dubious consequence of piecemeal health care legislation.
For almost forty years, legislators have advocated comprehensive measures designed to assure Americans quality health care. Instead of implementing an integrated health care plan, Congress has intermittently enacted statutes which address specific health care delivery problems. At times the judiciary has stretched the ambit of existing health legislation in response to particular plaintiffs' urgent claims. This Case Comment examines the dilemma of piecemeal legislation and judicial policymaking as exemplified by Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas v. Harris, a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals health care financing decision whose outcome Congress has flatly rejected.
D003363:Cost Control / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005380:Financing, Government / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008489:Medical Indigency; D006278:Medicare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013781:Texas