Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
Elastomeric impression materials for fixed prosthodontics are considered most stable when they have an even thickness of 2 to 4 mm. To obtain this, a custom-made impression tray is recommended. The purpose of the present study was to compare the stability of impressions made in custom trays and trays made of chromium-plated brass. The impression materials chosen were polyether and silicone. Two master models of the upper jaw were made of metal. The canines and first molars represented abutment teeth with flat occlusal surfaces. An engraved cross on each surface made it possible to measure in a microscope the distances between the abutment teeth on the models and in the impressions. The accuracy of the method was within +/- 8 micron. Twelve standardized impressions were made with each impression material in the two types of trays. The distances between the abutment teeth were measured immediately on removal of the impression, and after 1 and 24 hours. Although ample amount of impression material (2 to 9 mm) was allowed, the linear dimensional stability of the impressions made in stock trays was not inferior to the stability of impressions made in custom-made trays.
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000497:Alloys; D003760:Dental Impression Materials; D003761:Dental Impression Technique / Q000295:instrumentation*; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D012408:Rubber; D012826:Silicone Elastomers; D013499:Surface Properties
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000497:Alloys; D003760:Dental Impression Materials; C022821:Impregum; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D012826:Silicone Elastomers; D012408:Rubber