A biochemical study of two bifunctional reagents as alternatives to formocresol.
Two bifunctional reagents, glutaraldehyde and dimethylsuberimidate, were compared to formaldehyde with respect to fixation and modification of protein. Glutaraldehyde proved the superior fixative based on cross-linking and enzyme degradation assays. An immunoprecipitation assay suggests that the reaction products of glutaraldehyde may have altered antigenicity.
D000447:Aldehydes / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003432:Cross-Linking Reagents; D004120:Dimethyl Suberimidate / Q000494:pharmacology*; D005404:Fixatives; D005557:Formaldehyde / Q000494:pharmacology*; D005976:Glutaral / Q000494:pharmacology*; D007096:Imidoesters / Q000494:pharmacology*; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials
D000447:Aldehydes; D003432:Cross-Linking Reagents; D005404:Fixatives; D007096:Imidoesters; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D005557:Formaldehyde; D004120:Dimethyl Suberimidate; D005976:Glutaral