title: [The effectiveness of different methods of laparoscopic tubal sterilization (author's transl)].
abstract: If sterilization is offered today to a young multipara pointing out the possibility of eventual later recanalization the most essential point lies in thorough patient information. The patient must be informed that less aggressive techniques like thermocoagulation or mechanical tubal occlusion bear a higher risk of failure and consequently eventual pregnancy 2%-4%-7%. Such failures are part of the method and must and cannot be considered malpractice. Extensive patient information about all pros and cons is the only way to avoid future problems. Spontaneous tubal recanalization has occurred and may occur to the most skilled surgeon. After twenty years of personal experience with almost all methods of laparoscopic tubal sterilization my recommendation today is: bipolar sterilization on one site of the isthmical tubal portion with division of the coagulated tissue. Even so sufficient tubal tissue should remain intact to allow eventual later recanalization. We were never disappointed with this way of proceeding and so far, contrary to all other methods, have observed no pregnancy among our patients.
mesh_terms: D004564:Electrocoagulation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008026:Ligation; D011247:Pregnancy; D013243:Sterilization Reversal; D013246:Sterilization, Tubal / Q000379:methods
vernacular_title: Wie sicher sind die einzelnen Methoden der laparoskopischen Tubensterilisation?