Justifying additional pharmacist staff in an era of cost reductions.
A proposal is described that justified adding one full-time equivalent (FTE) pharmacist in a 125-bed community hospital that already employed in its pharmacy department 2.5 FTE pharmacists and 5.2 FTE other personnel. The administrative steps taken included identifying the need for an additional staff member and documenting the cost effectiveness of various clinical activities. Literature references were used to justify the proposed ratio of pharmacists to technicians; to show the results of deficiencies in supervision, motivation, and scheduling; and to demonstrate the cost effectiveness of serum concentration monitoring, formulary review, and patient discharge-medication consultations. Results of formulary review, drug-use audits, dosing guidelines, and serum concentration monitoring performed by the pharmacy department were included in the proposal. Prospective drug-use reviews, computerized pharmacokinetic dose determinations, additional educational programs, and tighter purchasing policies were identified as other cost-saving activities that could be performed with an additional pharmacist. A 12-page proposal was submitted in July 1983 to the hospital administrator and the budget review committee, and the additional staff position was approved. The key to maintaining the new pharmacist position will be the continual documentation of cost-saving activities within the department.
D002017:Budgets; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005572:Formularies, Hospital as Topic; D006744:Hospital Bed Capacity, 100 to 299; D006801:Humans; D008824:Michigan; D010559:Personnel Management / Q000191:economics*; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / Q000191:economics*; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations / Q000097:blood; D010601:Pharmacology, Clinical / Q000191:economics; D010607:Pharmacy Service, Hospital; D011445:Prospective Payment System; D000078329:Workforce
D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations