[Focal liver diseases. Comparative study of computed tomography, conventional ultrasound and the automated multisector scanner (Octoson)].
A comparative study, on 251 patients, between CT, Octoson and conventional ultrasound, established that CT (with angio-CT) had the highest rate of sensitivity (95.86%). The Octoson examination had a higher sensitivity (92.58%) than the conventional ultrasonic examination (82.64%). This result is achieved because superficial and subdiaphragmatic metastases, which lie in the depth of the liver, are better presented by the Octoson than with a mechanical sector scanner. Superficial metastases need to be presented with a water-path transducer for superficial lesions and subdiaphragmatic metastases with a wide range focus transducer. These areas can also be accurately shown on scanners with a dynamic transducer. The specificity of these three methods lies between 90 and 96%.
D004444:Echinococcosis, Hepatic / Q000175:diagnosis; D006391:Hemangioma / Q000175:diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D008100:Liver Abscess / Q000175:diagnosis; D008107:Liver Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000556:secondary; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014465:Ultrasonics / Q000295:instrumentation; D014463:Ultrasonography
Herdförmige Lebererkrankungen. Vergleichsstudie Computertomographie, konventioneller Ultraschall, automatisierter Multisektorscanner (Octoson).