Comparison of ambulatory electrocardiography and exercise testing.
Ambulatory electrocardiography and exercise testing are two noninvasive diagnostic procedures widely employed to evaluate patients for cardiac arrhythmias and S-T segment changes. This review addresses the differences and similarities of the two techniques, and examines the relative diagnostic and prognostic merit of the arrhythmia and S-T segment changes detected with each method. Ambulatory electrocardiography is more sensitive than exercise testing in detecting cardiac arrhythmias. The recording of ventricular arrhythmia is of value in predicting sudden death in survivors of myocardial infarction, whereas exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmia has limited predictive value. Nevertheless, exercise-induced S-T depression is of great prognostic value in predicting mortality and sudden death in patients with acute and chronic coronary heart disease.
D000553:Ambulatory Care; D000788:Angina Pectoris, Variant / Q000175:diagnosis; D001145:Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Q000175:diagnosis; D006332:Cardiomegaly / Q000503:physiopathology; D002312:Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic / Q000175:diagnosis; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000175:diagnosis; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D006801:Humans; D008945:Mitral Valve Prolapse / Q000175:diagnosis; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000503:physiopathology; D011379:Prognosis