A comparative flow study of the Omniscience and the Björk-Shiley cardiac valve prostheses.
The pressure-flow rate characteristics of two new convex-concave pivoting disc prosthetic heart valves are evaluated in vitro. The Omniscience and Björk-Shiley prostheses are chosen since both use curved occluders with similar dynamic function, but with different occluder curvature and eccentricity. The Omniscience prosthesis is shown to have consistently less pressure loss, and therefore less energy loss, over a range of steady state and pulsatile flow rates. The enhanced flow characteristics of the Omniscience valve are attributed to the larger opening angle of the occluder, the method of retaining the occluder, in the valve frame, the smaller curvature of the occluder, the smaller pivot-axis eccentricity, and the smaller profile thickness of the occluder. The valves are also tested in the closed position, with steady state pressure gradients causing leakage or backflow. This data is compared with the pulsatile pressure-flow rate data to gain insight into the nature of regurgitation. The total regurgitation of the pivoting disc valves are thought to be strongly dependent upon both the maximal opening angle of the occluder and the radial clearance between the disc and the valve orifice. Both the Omniscience valve and the Björk-Shiley valve are found to have nearly equal volumes of total regurgitation.
D001021:Aortic Valve; D001022:Aortic Valve Insufficiency / Q000517:prevention & control; D001794:Blood Pressure; D006350:Heart Valve Prosthesis / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008433:Mathematics; D008955:Models, Cardiovascular; D011474:Prosthesis Design / Q000592:standards