title: [Surgical therapy of breast cancer: to operate radically or to preserve the breast?].
abstract: Surgical treatment, i.e. partial resection (R) versus modified radical mastectomy (M) in lymph node negative T1/2 patients and M versus the classical Halsted procedure (RM) in lymph node positive cases, as well as adjuvant treatment forms, namely chemotherapy (B) and chemoimmunotherapy (C) versus a control group treated by surgery only (A) have been evaluated in 241 patients with breast cancer follow up over a median observation time of 48 months. Whereas M showed significantly better results than R, no difference was detected between M and RM. The incidence of recurrence in the R group did not appear to be markedly reduced by cytotoxic treatment. In the same way, the data from a retrospective study on non-randomized patients treated by breast resection, showed a relatively high local recurrence rate (23.6%) at a median observation level of 10 years. Considering the various forms of surgical treatment for operable breast cancer by analysing the data from retrospective studies and prospective randomized trials from the literature as well as our own results, the only recommendation for the standard treatment of patients with primary operable breast cancer should be nothing less than modified radical mastectomy. Breast-conserving treatment forms should be tested only within the framework of controlled clinical trials.
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000601:surgery; D008408:Mastectomy / Q000379:methods; D009362:Neoplasm Metastasis; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011897:Random Allocation
vernacular_title: Chirurgische Therapie beim Mammakarzinom: Radikal operieren oder Brust erhalten?