title: The peer review privilege: a law in search of a valid policy.
abstract: The peer review privilege prevents patient-plaintiffs from obtaining the hospital records prepared in connection with quality review proceedings. The privilege, created by statute in most states, is rationalized by the need for confidentiality in promoting complete and candid peer review. In this Article, the Author argues that the privilege cannot effectively promote confidentiality since a common exception allows physicians to obtain the records when seeking judicial review of proceedings leading to their exclusion or dismissal from hospital medical staffs. More significantly, the Author notes that while the privilege began as a device to protect physicians from testifying against their will in malpractice suits--a condonation of the "conspiracy of silence"--it has evolved into a vehicle which enables hospitals to conceal the evidence of their own neglect.
mesh_terms: D003219:Confidentiality; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D033283:Patient Access to Records; D028701:Patient Rights; D010380:Peer Review; D014481:United States