title: Medical Malpractice Arbitration Act: Michigan's experience with arbitration.
abstract: In the 1970's, Michigan and other states were confronted with a medical malpractice crisis of astronomical proportions. The escalating number of medical malpractice lawsuits and concomitant increase in malpractice premiums for health care providers fostered a divisive climate among doctors, lawyers and patients. In response to this crisis, the Michigan legislature enacted the Medical Malpractice Arbitration Act. The Act establishes a process whereby patients may agree to arbitrate any claims rather than pursue them through the courts. Part II of this Article discusses the historical evolution of arbitration as a precursor to its establishment as a resolution modality for health care disputes. Part III describes the statutory framework of the Michigan Medical Malpractice Arbitration Act. Part IV discusses the contractual and constitutional challenges to the arbitration statute and their resolution in Morris v. Metriyakool. As the law respecting arbitration becomes less vulnerable to judicial perforation, this Author suggests that other jurisdictions treat the Michigan Medical Arbitration Program as an archetype, susceptible to replication.
mesh_terms: D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007351:Insurance, Liability / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008824:Michigan