title: Colleagues: to protect or not?
abstract: I have presented a basic approach for the clinical gastroenterologist to follow in the event that he is asked by his patient whether or not to sue a fellow practitioner. Although there is a dearth of information in the literature concerning this topic, it is probably more important than generally realized. I conclude that basic honesty is paramount. White lies, equivocation, and obfuscation are discouraged. The importance of restricting the gastroenterologist's opinion to medical matters and avoiding legal determinations and advice is stressed. The dilemma of acting as an expert witness is mentioned. Finally, a few basic elements of the tort of defamation are presented within the context of the discussion.
mesh_terms: D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005104:Expert Testimony; D005762:Gastroenterology; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D014342:Truth Disclosure; D014481:United States