title: Comments on a standardized version of Luria's tests.
abstract: Appreciation is expressed for the work of Golden's group in the selection of Luria's tests, the standardization of their administration, the collection of norms, and the evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Luria-Nebraska test battery. However, questions are raised concerning the ability of the test to efficiently handle topical diagnosis and to construct rehabilitation programs. Concern is expressed over the possible vulgarization of Luria's doctrine of functional systems and the loss of predictive power in Luria's tests through neglect of qualitative information and methodology. Suggestions are made as to how Luria's qualitative methodology might be incorporated in a standardized version of a neuropsychological examination.
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007361:Intelligence Tests / Q000592:standards*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests / Q000592:standards*