Use of sealants: societal and professional factors.
At present, sealant use continues at a low level in private practice by dentists and hygienists, and is moderate in community programs although there is high interest in their use in public health settings. Widespread delegation of sealant application to hygienists has not occurred even though the majority of state dental practice acts allow it, and even though practicing hygienists are highly interested in applying sealants. Use in federally sponsored programs is minimal or nonexistent. Information about sealants and adequate clinical experience in their application appear minimal in dental training institutions, and few opportunities have existed for continuing education. Generally, knowledge about sealants among dentists is low; many hold doubtful opinions. Insurance carriers, including commercial, provider, and governmental programs, appear reluctant to reimburse for sealants without purchaser demand and organized dentistry's blessings. Although society emphasizes patient rights to informed consent, few opportunities exist for the public, including group insurance purchasers and union negotiators, to learn about sealant use in conjunction with appropriate fluoride use. Public educational materials are sparse. Manufacturer marketing efforts at present, aimed at providers alone, are at best minimal, with a few exceptions; those targeting the public are nonexistent. Organized dentistry's Council statements may have contributed to a constriction, to date, in the flow of public information about sealants from industry. Lack of communication, or miscommunication, between practitioners and dental scientists has resulted in much misinformation and confusion about the value of sealants and their use. And, the contemporary status of dental manpower and the economy of dental practice in the private sector appear to have provided an infertile environment for acceptance of sealants as a primary preventive technology. In the public sector, interest in sealants is high but two primary constraints are inadequate manpower and lack of financial resources. Clearly there has been a time-lag in the adoption of new sealant products, and it is apparent that no one factor can explain this lag; rather, many complex factors must be taken into account simultaneously. Extent of need does not appear to have influenced use, to date. Often, social change is slow, and all things considered, the lag observed for sealants may not be totally unreasonable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
D000571:American Dental Association; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D055598:Chemical Phenomena; D002627:Chemistry, Physical; D003149:Community Dentistry; D003727:Dental Auxiliaries / Q000193:education; D003815:Dentists; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D004497:Education, Dental; D006076:Government; D006267:Health Education, Dental; D006801:Humans; D007347:Insurance, Dental; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants / Q000592:standards / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011331:Private Practice; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms; D014481:United States
D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants