title: A comparison of two methods for determining ultrasonic intensity for medical transducers.
abstract: The spatial and temporal average intensity (ISATA) is determined for four diagnostic ultrasound transducers by two methods: (a) direct measurements (beam profiling) with a miniature hydrophone, as described in the AIUM-NEMA standard, and (b) estimating from measurements of total power and assumptions about beam size. The latter method is frequently used by diagnostic ultrasound manufacturers when reporting output levels to users and regulatory agencies. However, due to the conventions for defining beam area, this method actually overestimates the spatial average intensity. For the four transducers tested, the estimated ISATA exceeds the measured ISATA by several hundred percent. The spatial peak, temporal average intensity (ISPTA) was also measured for the four transducers and is less than the estimated ISATA in every case.
mesh_terms: D000162:Acoustics; D008722:Methods; D014159:Transducers; D014465:Ultrasonics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014463:Ultrasonography