[Facial nerve reconstruction--after the operation of C-P angle tumor].
Nineteen patients who undergo facial nerve reconstruction after the operation of cerebellopontine angle tumor from 1964 to 1981 were investigated. Eighteen cases were of acoustic neurinoma, and one was of low grade astrocytoma. Spinal accessory-facial nerve anastomosis was performed in thirteen cases. Cross facial nerve graft was done in three cases. Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis, phrenico-facial nerve anastomosis, and intracranial direct anastomosis were done in one case each. In spinal accessory-facial nerve anastomosis cases, good result was obtained only in 30%, but using microsurgical technique since 1972, its rate went up to 50%. In cross facial nerve anastomosis cases in which two sural nerve grafts were used and the zygomatic and the buccal branches of the right and left connected each other, only one of three revealed good result. The cases of hypoglossal and intracranial direct facial anstomosis resulted in good recovery. As our conclusion, it is difficult to obtain the powerful reinnervation by means of the spinal accessory facial nerve anatomosis and the cross facial nerve graft. Therefore, the best method to be chosen in facial nerve reconstruction seems intracranial direct anastomosis. If the method is impossible, hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis should be chosen as the second best. The cross facial nerve graft seems to be leaving much room for technical improvement.
D000055:Accessory Nerve / Q000601:surgery; D001254:Astrocytoma / Q000601:surgery; D002528:Cerebellar Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D002530:Cerebellopontine Angle; D005154:Facial Nerve / Q000601:surgery*; D020220:Facial Nerve Injuries; D006801:Humans; D007002:Hypoglossal Nerve / Q000601:surgery; D007431:Intraoperative Complications; D008722:Methods; D009464:Neuroma, Acoustic / Q000601:surgery; D010791:Phrenic Nerve / Q000601:surgery