title: The physiologic effects of ileal reservoirs and efferent conduits complementing ileoanal anastomosis: an experimental study in dogs.
abstract: S-shaped ileal reservoirs (SSRs) and double-barreled ileal reservoirs (DBRs) of equal size were placed 6 or 2 cm from the anus and evaluated over 1 year for their ability to improve the functional incontinence noted after an ileoanal anastomosis (IAA). Compared to straight IAA, both reservoirs prolonged intestinal transit (235 minutes versus 135 minutes, P less than 0.001) and alleviated frequency without causing nutritional abnormalities. The capacity of the reservoirs was greater than that of a comparable length of distal ileum in dogs (n = 6) with straight IAA (304 +/- 16 ml versus 102 +/- 2 ml, P less than 0.001). The SSRs (n = 9), in contrast to the DBRs (n = 10), developed excessive volume capacity (360 +/- 30 ml versus 254 +/- 104 ml, P less than 0.01) and obstructive complications. Reservoirs with 6 cm efferent conduits (n = 13), in contrast to those with a 2 cm efferent conduit (n = 6), underwent marked dilatation (334 +/- 24 ml versus 238 +/- 13 ml, P less than 0.005). Electromyography and manometry revealed the DBRs to be more contractile than the SSRs but less than ileum proximal to the anus in dogs with a straight IAA. Ileal reservoirs improve results after IAA. Reservoirs should be complaint and yet contractile (e.g., DBR) so as to discourage excessive dilatation, which is the harbinger of obstruction. Ileal conduits facilitate reservoir placement, but if longer than 2 cm they excessively impeded reservoir emptying, predisposing to excessive reservoir dilatation and obstruction. A DBR with a 2 cm efferent conduit results in continence without obstructive problems.
mesh_terms: D000042:Absorption; D001003:Anal Canal / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D003125:Colostomy / Q000379:methods; D003672:Defecation; D004285:Dogs; D004576:Electromyography; D005769:Gastrointestinal Motility; D007082:Ileum / Q000601:surgery*