Comparison of four different methods for detection of rubella IgM antibodies.
Four different tests for detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies were compared: two Ig separation methods (centrifugation and chromatography) with subsequent haemagglutination inhibition test and two commercially available ELISA tests. The 114 sera tested had been sent to the diagnostic laboratory, mostly with insufficient clinical histories. Agreement between the centrifugation method and one of the ELISA tests was good (2 divergent results with 107 sera tested), while the other ELISA test yielded more positive (partly perhaps non-specific) results. The chromatographic method did not separate the Ig classes as reliably as the centrifugation method, but because of its simplicity it may be useful, if adequate test controls are performed. The divergent results are discussed. It is postulated that in cases with pending induced abortion, two independent tests should be performed.
D000914:Antibodies, Viral / Q000032:analysis*; D002852:Chromatography, Ion Exchange / Q000379:methods; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006385:Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests / Q000379:methods*; D007074:Immunoglobulin G / Q000032:analysis; D007075:Immunoglobulin M / Q000032:analysis*; D012412:Rubella virus / Q000276:immunology*; D014461:Ultracentrifugation / Q000379:methods
D000914:Antibodies, Viral; D007074:Immunoglobulin G; D007075:Immunoglobulin M