title: Surgical versus percutaneous removal of the intra-aortic balloon.
abstract: In order to determine the best method for removal of the percutaneous intra-aortic balloon (IAB), we divided 38 patients into two groups. The IAB was removed percutaneously in Group I and surgically in Group II. There were two hemorrhagic and four thrombotic complications sufficiently severe to necessitate vascular surgical intervention in Group I. There were no vascular complications in Group II (p less than 0.1). Among the 19 patients in Group II, eight were found to have acute thrombosis of the superficial or deep femoral artery at the time of operation. It is concluded that thrombus development at the site of IAB insertion is a common event and often leads to acute ischemia. Surgical removal of a percutaneously placed IAB is recommended because it provides an opportunity for the detection and removal of thrombotic material, as well as careful closure of the puncture site.
mesh_terms: D001243:Assisted Circulation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007423:Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D011677:Punctures