Opportunity and health care: criticisms and suggestions.
orman Daniels' proposal to distribute health care on the basis of fair equality of opportunity, is, in this writer's opinion, unworkable. His concepts of species-typical activity and normal opportunity range are unclear; so is the relationship between them. His view that justice accords disease a better claim on the health dollar than other causes of death, pain, and disability, commits him unknowingly to indefensible positions on particular sorts of health care, such as the care of the aging and of pregnant women. Daniels' concept of opportunity is so inclusive, his notion of balancing opportunities so vague, that his theory loses systematic power. I offer a different account from Daniels' concerning why health care needs are objective and of special importance. I also argue for a voucher system which levels out class inequalities and which finances current medical practices more or less uncritically, but allows for change through a diversity of insurance plans available to consumers. This system is just, and more practical than rating health care needs by impact on opportunity.
D000375:Aging; D003729:Dental Care; D005260:Female; D006291:Health Policy / Q000191:economics; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D010684:Philosophy; D011247:Pregnancy; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012935:Social Justice