title: Dyphylline versus theophylline: a double-blind comparative evaluation.
abstract: This study was a randomized double-blind evaluation of three doses of dyphylline, theophylline, and placebo for blocking exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB). Twenty patients aged 12 to 17 years took one of the following on five separate days prior to an exercise challenge: 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg dyphylline; 6 mg/kg anhydrous theophylline; or placebo. Linear relationships were found between the log of dyphylline doses and per cent changes from baseline for PEFR, FEV1 and FEF25-75%. The 15 and 20 mg/kg doses differed significantly from placebo in preventing declines in PEFR, FEV1, and FEF25-75%. While significant, these changes were one half to one third those found with 6 mg/kg theophylline. Tremor was twice as common with theophylline. While dyphylline has therapeutic effectiveness compared to placebo for blocking EIB, its benefit is small. Further evaluations are needed to elucidate optimal dosaging for maximal effectiveness.
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001249:Asthma / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000503:physiopathology; D001986:Bronchial Spasm / Q000188:drug therapy*; D002648:Child; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004400:Dyphylline / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005260:Female; D005541:Forced Expiratory Volume; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D005082:Physical Exertion; D013806:Theophylline / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D004400:Dyphylline; D013806:Theophylline