Mourning is a family affair.
Mourning is a process of social disengagement. In our modern society, however, the influence of social and religious institutions on the process of mourning has significantly diminished and been partially replaced by mental health clinics. Given the latter's penchant for the intrapsychic view, the perspective on mourning has become reduced to the individual. These trends are clearly reflected in a review of current literature and research on mourning. This paper proposes an interactional, systemic view of mourning through the analysis of two different families. Findings indicate that despite contextual differences between these two families, some basic commonalities render generalizations possible: (a) The selection of the identified patient is not coincidental to the stage of the family life cycle and to the role of the deceased member in the system. (b) Although death affects each individual differently, depending upon his or her relationship with the deceased, it continues to influence all family relations with equal powers. (c) Nonresolution of mourning permits a ghost to become an integral member of the family system. Examination of the treatment process demonstrates that a systemic approach is effective, even when individuals are interviewed alone.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002667:Child Reactive Disorders / Q000235:genetics / Q000628:therapy; D005190:Family; D005196:Family Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006117:Grief; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008426:Maternal Deprivation; D010333:Paternal Deprivation