The ethical and legal framework for the decision not to resuscitate.
Practicing physicians are frequently faced with the question of whether or not to institute cardiopulmonary resuscitation in case of cardiac or respiratory arrest in a patient in hospital. Medical training has usually not included any systematic analysis of this issue from either an ethical or a legal standpoint. Many physicians may be unaware that ethical and legal principles, as well as professional guidelines, exist to guide such decision making. In practice, physicians make this decision without the benefit of training in ethical analysis. The problem is especially acute in teaching hospitals when young physicians unacquainted with formal ethics or the law must often make decisions emergently. Studies show some discrepancy between ethical and legal principles and the actual decision making by physicians. For this reason, we recommend an approach that will enable physicians to make and implement decisions not to resuscitate that are consistent with current ethical and legal standards.
D026686:Beneficence; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D028681:Moral Obligations; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D010358:Patient Participation; D018579:Patient Selection; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010819:Physician's Role; D012151:Resuscitation; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment