Visible persistence as a function of spatial frequency, number of cycles and retinal area.
Using a variety of measures it has been shown that processing time increases with increasing spatial frequency. Long and Sakitt (1981) [Vision Res. 21, 1387-1393] investigated duration of visible persistence as a function of both spatial frequency and number of cycles present. They concluded that number of cycles and not spatial frequency is the crucial variable in determining duration of visible persistence. The present paper investigates this issue in three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 determined duration of visible persistence with spatial frequencies of 2, 4, 8 and 10 c/deg while holding both number of cycles and grating area constant in a dark surround and in a light surround. Stimulus durations of 50 and 300 msec were used in Experiments 1 and 2 respectively. The results at each stimulus duration showed an increase in duration of visible persistence with increasing spatial frequency similar to that found in most previous reports. This increase was less with a 300 than with a 50 msec stimulus duration. Whether the gratings were presented in a light or a dark surround had no significant effect. Experiment 3 showed that at 2 c/deg duration of visible persistence increased with increasing size of the grating stimuli when all stimulus sizes fell within the area of spatial summation. This effect was greater in a dark than in light surround. It is concluded that visible persistence does increase with spatial frequency. Previous results inconsistent with this conclusion are explained in terms of spatial summation.
D000360:Afterimage / Q000502:physiology; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010783:Photometry; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology*; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology; D013997:Time Factors; D014794:Visual Fields