Influence of matching volume on reproducibility of maximal expiratory flow-volume curves.
We examined the influence of "matching volume" on intrasubject variability of the descending limb of maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curves on air and helium-oxygen (He) in 18 healthy subjects and 28 patients with airflow limitation. Duplicate forced expirations were analysed according to four methods of alignment. With the first method, flows corresponding to identical percentiles of separate FVC (SEPVC) were compared. With the remaining three, we aligned curves at TLC, mid-vital capacity (VC50) and RV, respectively, for comparison of: a) flow at identical percentiles of the averaged FVC and b) expired volume at identical percentiles of the averaged peak flow. In healthy subjects, variability of flow at 50% and 75% of expired FVC (FEF50 and FEF75) did not change significantly with method, except that FEF75 on air varied more with method SEPVC than with VC50. In airflow limitation, FEF75 was significantly less reproducible when curves were matched at RV than at TLC, both on air and He. Over the latter part of expiration, an arbitrary index of variability of flow-defined volume also indicated that method RV gave the poorest precision in patients. We conclude that selection of matching volume does not influence the variability of MEFV-curves in health. In airflow limitation, however, TLC appears to be the most reliable volume for alignment.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D005540:Forced Expiratory Flow Rates; D006801:Humans; D008176:Lung Volume Measurements; D008297:Male; D008449:Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves; D008450:Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate; D008722:Methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D012115:Residual Volume; D014109:Total Lung Capacity; D014797:Vital Capacity