Cluster analysis of the WAIS on brain-damaged patients.
In recognition of increased usage of cluster analytic techniques, the current study attempted to examine sampling bounds for tests and subjects on one cluster-analytic procedure. Specifically, the WAIS subtest scores from a heterogeneous group of subjects with CNS involvement were first, factor analyzed and then clustered by means of Ward's hierarchical procedure. This methodology had been previously applied to two different samples of aphasics and aphasia batteries. In both these aphasic studies, an underlying severity dimension of language dysfunction was found. In contrast, in the current study, salient feature groups were found. Moreover, these groups were distributed in a sequential or hierarchical model in terms of specific cognitive deficits. From these data, it is argued that two major parameters in determining the resulting cluster structures are the homogeneity/heterogeneity of the sample and test battery employed. Although such a statement is obvious, the theoretical ramifications are large, in that the cluster structure may be a function of test weighting or sample diversity, not the phenomenon of interest. However, the cluster structures found in the current study were consistent with historical models of cognitive dysfunction and also lend support to hierarchical models of sequential cognitive impairment. These findings are discussed in terms of their clinical and experimental ramifications with respect to grouping subjects in terms of WAIS profiles.
D000328:Adult; D001925:Brain Damage, Chronic / Q000523:psychology; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000523:psychology*; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000523:psychology; D002561:Cerebrovascular Disorders / Q000523:psychology; D003071:Cognition; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014888:Wechsler Scales