title: Arthroscopic, open partial, and total meniscectomy. A comparative study.
abstract: The results of three different types of meniscectomy have been compared in 219 knees, 71 treated by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, 45 treated by open partial meniscectomy, and 103 treated by open total meniscectomy, with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years. Knees which had undergone previous operations or had other simultaneous operative procedures or ligamentous damage were excluded. Knees with chondromalacia were included provided that this did not amount to frank osteoarthritis. Simple indicators were used for the rate of early recovery from the operation, and the Tapper and Hoover scale was used to record the symptomatic results in the longer term. It was found that knees treated by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy did considerably better than the others by all the criteria used. In most parts of the study there was a clear gradation between the results of the three types of treatment: arthroscopic techniques did better than open operations, and partial meniscectomy did better than total meniscectomy.
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001182:Arthroscopy; D002357:Cartilage Diseases / Q000601:surgery; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007718:Knee Injuries / Q000601:surgery; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D008124:Locomotion; D008297:Male; D008722:Methods; D008875:Middle Aged