title: Erratic sequential eye-movements in dyslexics: comments and reply to Stanley et al.
abstract: The results of the Pavlidis' dyslexia studies are consistent with the existing literature and have also been recently replicated using the same subject selection criteria, instructions to subjects, experimental procedures, tests and analyses. Stanley et al.'s: (a) subject selection criteria, (b) instructions to subjects, (c) experimental procedures, (d) temporo-spatial characteristics of the sequentially illuminated LEDs and (e) data analysis procedures differ from those used in the Pavlidis' studies and, therefore, also differ their results.
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D002648:Child; D004410:Dyslexia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D005133:Eye Movements; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception