A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding.
A study was conducted for the purpose of comparing mesiodistal tooth widths between a group of patients with good tooth alignment and a group of patients with crowded dental arches. Crowded arches were defined as those with more than 4 mm. of space deficiency. The hypothesis tested was whether the arches with more than 4 mm. of crowding consistently had larger teeth than the ones with lesser or no crowding. The difference in sizes between the groups (forty males and forty females) for all teeth measured was found to be statistically significant (p less than 0.001). The multivariate data analysis indicated that the two groups were derived from two different populations and that the maxillary lateral incisors and second premolars and the mandibular canines and premolars were particularly different in these groups. It was also determined that the teeth in males were uniformly larger than in females, but not to a statistically significant level. There was less correlation, however, between the sex and the status of the tooth alignment in dental arches, so that both sexes had similar distribution of crowding versus noncrowding. On the basis of this study of eighty North American Caucasians, it is suggested that one should consider the sum of mesiodistal widths of teeth, in addition to the arch length analysis, in formulating an orthodontic treatment plan. When the cumulative tooth mass of the twenty permanent teeth is 140 mm. or more, the clinician may want to consider extraction therapy for such a case.
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D003724:Dental Arch / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000473:pathology* / Q000628:therapy; D009811:Odontometry; D012690:Serial Extraction; D012737:Sex Factors; D014070:Tooth / Q000033:anatomy & histology*