Effect of retraction procedures on the periodontium in humans.
On the basis of wound healing and gingival recession caused by the three procedures, the copper-band retraction method was the most satisfactory. This tentative conclusion is based on the following reasons: 1. Retraction methods must be evaluated relative to the impression procedure and fit of the restoration. The long-range effects of the marginal fit are probably the most important factor for enhancing periodontal health. 2. This study involved only healthy periodontia of adolescent patients. Different healing might be observed in tissues characterized by gingivitis or periodontitis. 3. A broader study involving a greater range of procedures and conditions is recommended to evaluate each retraction technique. 4. This study involved teeth which had an adequate zone of attached gingiva. More complicated healing and perhaps altered sequences might be observed if the procedures were performed on gingival margins of alveolar mucosa, thin gingival walls, or areas of root prominence and thin cortical bone.
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D003442:Crowns; D003760:Dental Impression Materials; D003761:Dental Impression Technique / Q000295:instrumentation; D003779:Denture Design; D004598:Electrosurgery; D005260:Female; D005881:Gingiva / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D005890:Gingivectomy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008434:Matrix Bands; D010519:Periodontium / Q000033:anatomy & histology*
D003760:Dental Impression Materials