title: Is a fat stitch necessary?
abstract: Two hundred and eight consecutive patients undergoing surgery were allocated randomly in a trial of the use of a plain catgut subcutaneous fat stitch, compared with no fat suture. There was no appreciable difference between the two trial groups in wound infection rate following either clean (4 out of 74 with and 1 out of 68 without a fat stitch) or contaminated operations (4 out of 27 with and 4 out of 41 without). Likewise, there were no differences in haematoma rates. There is therefore no appreciable benefit to be derived from the use of this stitch.
mesh_terms: D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000601:surgery*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002398:Catgut; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D005260:Female; D006406:Hematoma / Q000517:prevention & control; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009765:Obesity; D011897:Random Allocation; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000517:prevention & control; D013536:Suture Techniques