title: [Sodium salts or methylglucamine salts in contrast media for infusion pyelography? (author's transl)].
abstract: Tolerance of two contrast media was compared by a double blind study. High doses of iodine (45 g) were used for both contrast substances. Sodium Ioglicinate was giving best radiological contrast but produced more side-effects, especially nausea, as compared to Methylglucamine-Ioglicinate. On the contrary Methylglucamine-Ioglicinate did not give best density but did produce less side-effects. Thus the investigator has to consider very carefully, which of the compounds has to be preferred.
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000009:adverse effects; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D006801:Humans; D007483:Iothalamic Acid / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000031:analogs & derivatives*; D008536:Meglumine / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000031:analogs & derivatives; D008875:Middle Aged; D014567:Urography / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D007483:Iothalamic Acid; C016525:ioglicic acid; D008536:Meglumine; C019462:meglumine ioglicinate
vernacular_title: Natrium- oder Methylglukaminsalze der Kontrastmittel für die Infusionsurographie?