Failure of clinical criteria to distinguish between primary achalasia and achalasia secondary to tumor.
Three clinical criteria have been reported to distinguish patients with primary achalasia from patients with achalasia secondary to tumor invasion of the gastroesophageal junction. These criteria (age greater than 50 years, duration of symptoms less than one year, and weight loss greater than 15 pounds) are important because of their potential use for deciding between pneumatic dilation and exploratory surgery. In the present investigation we assessed the frequency of these criteria alone and in combination in 79 patients with primary and in two patients with secondary achalasia seen at our institution over a 9 1/2-year period. Our results indicate that while these criteria are highly sensitive and moderately specific, their predictive value for distinguishing secondary achalasia from primary achalasia is exceedingly low. For this reason, early exploratory surgery is not indicated in patients with newly diagnosed achalasia who meet these criteria unless there is prior radiologic or endoscopic evidence for tumor.
D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000150:complications; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000388:Air; D001835:Body Weight; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D004106:Dilatation; D004724:Endoscopy; D004931:Esophageal Achalasia / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000150:complications*; D004943:Esophagogastric Junction; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000150:complications*