Different patterns of harmonics in frequency-following responses.
Preliminary studies (Krogh et al., 1977) indicated pronounced intersubject differences with respect to harmonic distortion in the frequency-following responses (FFRs) elicited by high intensity, low frequency stimuli and recorded by means of surface electrodes from man. In the present investigation it was confirmed that the responses from 10 test subjects could be divided into three significantly different patterns on the basis of the relative amplitudes of the fundamental (first harmonic) and the second harmonic response component as measured by spectral analyses. In three of the subjects the ratio of the fundamental to the second harmonic was greater than 10 dB (which were termed a type I response). In five, the ratio was between 0 and 10 dB (type II response) and in two the second harmonic was equal to or greater than the fundamental (type III response). The possible causes of harmonic distortion if FFRs are discussed, but not definite explanation of the interindividual differences can be given. A psychoacoustical evaluation of the second harmonic distortion using a tone-on-tone octave masking technique (TOM) showed no correlation between TOM results and FFR type in 10 subjects.
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D003051:Cochlea / Q000502:physiology; D004432:Ear, Middle / Q000502:physiology; D004566:Electrodes; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010469:Perceptual Distortion / Q000502:physiology; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011571:Psychoacoustics