A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy.
A prospective trial is described in which simple tube drainage was compared with suction drainage after cholecystectomy. Postoperative chest infection and infected or painful drain wounds were both significantly more common with simple tube drains. Postoperative discomfort was more frequent with tube drains in situ and wound infection more common in the suction group, but neither of these differences was statistically significant. The mean volume of fluid drained and duration of hospital stay did not differ between methods. It is concluded that both methods are satisfactory, but suction drainage is recommended.
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002763:Cholecystectomy; D004322:Drainage / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011897:Random Allocation; D013396:Suction