Patient radiation doses in upper GI examinations: a comparison between conventional and double-contrast techniques.
A total of 60 patients, divided into 3 groups with 20 patients in each, were examined with 3 different techniques: group 1 -- conventional technique, exposure at 120 kV; group 2 -- double-contrast technique (hypotonic gastrography, HG), exposure at 80 kW; group 3 -- HG, exposure at 120 kV. All examinations were performed in the same examination room and by the same radiologist. Absorbed doses to skin, thyroid, breasts, and gonads as well as energy imparted were measured. The only significant dose enhancements found when using double-contrast instead of conventional technique were in the female breasts and then only if the voltage was in the lower range. With exposure at 120 kV there was little difference in absorbed dose, but a significant advantage with respect to energy was imparted when using a double-contrast technique instead of a conventional technique. The testes doses were very low in all 3 types of examinations, and it seems that use of a testes shield is hardly motivated. With regard to both diagnostic accuracy and patient radiation dose, there can be no reason to use a conventional technique for upper GI examinations.
D001940:Breast / Q000528:radiation effects; D005260:Female; D005767:Gastrointestinal Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006066:Gonads / Q000528:radiation effects; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011859:Radiography; D012867:Skin / Q000528:radiation effects; D013270:Stomach / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D013679:Technology, Radiologic; D013819:Thermoluminescent Dosimetry; D013961:Thyroid Gland / Q000528:radiation effects