A comparison of capillary hydraulic conductivities in postural and locomotor muscle.
In a comparative skeletal muscle study Folkow and Halicka (Microvasc. Res. 1: 1-14, 1968) reported that the capillary filtration coefficient (CFC) of postural (red) muscle was two times the CFC of locomotor (white) muscle. It was concluded that the twofold difference in CFC was due solely to a difference in the perfused capillary surface areas (Sf) of red vs. white muscle. However, CFC is the product of capillary hydraulic conductivity (LP) and Sf. Hence their conclusion assumed that the average LP of red muscle capillaries is exactly equal to the average LP of white muscle capillaries. The following study was undertaken to test the validity of this assumption. The microocclusion procedures and analytical model described by Lee et al. (Circ. Res. 28: 358-370, 1971) and Gore [Am. J. Physiol. 242 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 11): H268-H287, 1982] were used to determine LP. Independent measurements of LP were recorded from single capillaries in red, anterior latissimus dorsi (ALD) and white, posterior latissimus dorsi (PLD) muscles of chickens anesthetized with L.A. Thesia. We found that the mean capillary hydraulic conductivity in postural muscle [(LP)ALD = 0.20 +/- 0.06 (SE) micrometers . s-1 . cmH2O-1 (n = 11)] was significantly different from the mean capillary hydraulic conductivity in locomotor muscle [(LP)PLD = 0.061 +/- 0.01 micrometers . s-1 . cmH2O-1 (n = 14)] (P less than 0.05). These results provide direct evidence that observed differences in red vs. white muscle CFC's may not be due solely to different perfused capillary surface areas but may also be due to differences in capillary hydraulic conductivity.
D002196:Capillaries / Q000502:physiology; D005374:Filtration; D008124:Locomotion; D008433:Mathematics; D008833:Microcirculation; D009132:Muscles / Q000098:blood supply*; D011187:Posture; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D013499:Surface Properties