Do visual evoked potentials give relevant information to the neuro-ophthalmological examination in optic nerve lesions?
The visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and neuro-ophthalmological examinations of 134 patients were compared. The VEPs were abnormal in 95% of the eyes with optic neuritis. Defective color vision was found in 99%, visual field defects in 88%, decreased vision in 66% and an afferent pupillary defect in 55%. 29 patients with optic neuritis were followed up with repeated tests. VEPs and color vision recovered more slowly than visual acuity and visual field. Abnormal VEPs were observed in 68% of 50 MS patients. An analysis of symptomatic and asymptomatic eyes showed that testing of color vision, visual field and red-free ophthalmoscopy were equally as useful diagnostic tools as VEPs. 4 (8%) of the MS patients had abnormal VEPs despite a normal neuro-ophthalmological examination; 94% of MS patients with symptoms and 47% of MS patients without visual symptoms had abnormal VEPs. VEPs were pathological in 59% of 24 patients with traumatic or compressive optic nerve diseases or optic atrophies of unknown etiology. The neuro-ophthalmological examination was more sensitive than VEPs in the diagnosis of these disorders. A neuro-ophthalmological examination is in most cases sufficient to diagnose optic nerve lesions. VEPs are of diagnostic aid especially in mild optic nerve lesions.
D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual; D006801:Humans; D009103:Multiple Sclerosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D009460:Neurologic Examination; D009901:Optic Nerve Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014792:Visual Acuity; D014794:Visual Fields