Beyond abortion: the potential reach of a human life amendment.
In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court held that the constitutionally protected right to privacy includes a woman's right to terminate pregnancy. Following the decision, anti-abortion groups turned to Congress to limit or negate that right. As a result of their efforts, several "human life" statutes and constitutional amendments have been proposed. This Article focuses on the implications of proposed amendments that seek to ban or limit the availability of abortions indirectly by broadening the definition of "person" to include unborn individuals. The Article discusses the potentially serious effects such an amendment would have in areas unrelated to abortion. It finds that the resulting chaos and uncertainty would have great social costs, and concludes that if abortions are to be banned or restricted, a human life amendment that directly deals with abortion is preferable to one that defines "person" to include the unborn.
D000029:Abortion, Legal; D033421:Beginning of Human Life; D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003416:Criminal Law; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D005193:Family Planning Services; D005260:Female; D005306:Fertilization; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D033161:Government Regulation; D006806:Human Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007183:Income Tax; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D016365:Liability, Legal; D019369:Life; D010349:Patient Compliance; D028723:Personhood; D011057:Politics; D011247:Pregnancy; D037841:Pregnant People; D014481:United States; D014933:Women's Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence