title: A response to Nicholas F. Skinner's "The Hess, et al. study of pupillary activity in heterosexual and homosexual males: a re-evaluation".
abstract: Specific aspects of the original study, its replicability and the soundness of the methodology in appreciating individual differences are commented on.
mesh_terms: D001143:Arousal; D006716:Homosexuality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012025:Reflex, Pupillary