[The diagnostic value of pharmacologic double contrast and conventional barium meal of the stomach (author's transl)].
The authors compared the diagnostic accuracy of pharmacologic double contrast, conventional barium meal and oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy of the stomach in 922 selected patients. The agreement rate between conventional investigation and endoscopy was 70.3%, while it was 83.7% between double contrast studies and endoscopy. Double contrast false positives percentage (48.7%) is bigger than that for conventional technique (38.3%), whilst the latter has a much bigger number of false negatives, both absolutely (169 cases) and relatively (61.7%). Furthermore the association of double contrast and endoscopy was compared with the anatomo-pathological diagnosis in 335 cases. The agreement rate was 94.6%.
D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D004384:Duodenoscopy; D004945:Esophagoscopy; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005756:Gastritis / Q000175:diagnosis; D005773:Gastroscopy; D006801:Humans; D011859:Radiography; D013270:Stomach / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis; D013276:Stomach Ulcer / Q000175:diagnosis
D003287:Contrast Media
Valore diagnostico del doppio contrasto farmacologico e della indagine convenzionale nello studio radiologico dello stomaco.