Use of silicone rubber as a pericardial substitute to facilitate reoperation in cardiac surgery.
Reoperations following cardiac procedures have an increased risk because of the danger of damaging the heart, great vessels, or grafts because of adhesions to the sternum and anterior chest wall. We report our experience with the use of silicone rubber as a pericardial substitute in 102 patients--58 children undergoing palliative and corrective operations and 44 adults undergoing porcine valve insertion or coronary revascularization. The pericardial substitute was used only in cases in which reoperation was considered likely. There were no mediastinal infections. One adult had signs of cardiac constriction which improved markedly on administration of anti-inflammatory agents. Seven patients required reoperation for bleeding. Two patients who underwent Fontan procedures developed pericardial effusions necessitating a pericardial window. Reoperation was undertaken 1 to 12 months postoperatively in seven patients, all of whom were children. The silicon rubber greatly facilitated opening of the chest bone but did not affect the formation of adhesions within the pericardium. Postmortem examinations have been obtained in two cases 5 and 9 months postoperatively, and showed a thin layer of dense fibrous tissue adjacent to the silicone rubber. We conclude that silicone rubber may be used as a pericardial substitute and that it facilitates reoperation following cardiac operations. Particular caution should be used in patients undergoing Fontan procedures, as there appears to be a tendency for pericardial effusions and tamponade to develop.
D000328:Adult; D006348:Cardiac Surgical Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008875:Middle Aged; D010496:Pericardium / Q000601:surgery*; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D012828:Silicones
D012828:Silicones