title: A comparison of the long term results of three types of posterior fusion of the lumbar spine for spondylolisthesis.
abstract: Between 1923 and 1976, 312 posterior spinal fusions using the methods of Albee, Bosworth and Hibbs were performed on patients with spondylolisthesis at the Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich. Long-term clinical results were rated as good in 80% of all patients operated on with the Albee method. The results after the Hibbs procedure on the other hand was good in only 65%. Progressive vertebral slipping after operation was seen in about 60% of all patients operated on by Albee's method, particularly in cases with severe spondylolisthesis. This slipping stops as soon as the intervertebral space had fused. Relief of the subjective symptoms also occured at this time. This phenomenon was only rarely seen after the Hibbs operation, in which the better postoperative stability leads to sclerosis of the discs indicating degenerative changes without a significant decrease in the disc height. The greater stability of the Hibb's fusion is more easily overstressed by body movements which can cause persistent symptoms and later lead to fatigue fractures.
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D011542:Pseudarthrosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D011859:Radiography; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000379:methods*; D013168:Spondylolisthesis / Q000601:surgery*