title: Blunt abdominal trauma: exploratory laparotomy or peritoneal lavage?
abstract: In contrast to other series purporting advantages of routine lavage [20], our data support the position that, in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, certain criteria eliminate the need for peritoneal lavage and make this procedure an unwise investment of valuable time on a routine basis. Criteria such as evidence of hollow organ rupture on radiologic studies, gross abdominal wall defects (excluding simple lacerations), rapidly increasing abdominal distention, uncorrectable hypotension and isolated rigidity on abdominal examination in an otherwise intact and cooperative patient, should be considered indications for laparotomy. In a stable patient with associated injuries or altered central nervous system status, abdominal examination should be viewed as suspect and peritoneal lavage considered mandatory. However, in over one fourth of cases, positive lavage may fail to correlate with intraabdominal injury of a degree that necessitates operative repair. In patients admitted for observation of abdominal injuries with concurrent alterations in central nervous system status or associated injuries that hinder accurate abdominal examination when no urgency exists, we support the opinion that selective use of peritoneal lavage will save unnecessary delay in diagnosis and operative treatment. The highly lethal nature of multiple injuries and central nervous system damage is confirmed by our data, veryfying reports by Davis et al [6] of a 70 percent or greater mortality rate among comatose patients hospitalized with multiple trauma.
mesh_terms: D000007:Abdominal Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007813:Laparotomy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010529:Peritoneal Cavity; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D007507:Therapeutic Irrigation; D014949:Wounds, Nonpenetrating / Q000175:diagnosis*