title: Ductal drainage or resection for chronic pancreatitis.
abstract: We report a 10 year review comparing the results of pain relief after three procedures for chronic pancreatitis: Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy, modified Puestow side-to-side longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy and distal pancreatic resection. Results of follow-up review at 6 months, 2 years and 5 years were tabulated. Five year follow-up data were available on more than 80 percent of patients. The proportion of good results for pain relief decreased with the passage of time regardless of the procedure performed. Although equally good results are obtained after either pancreatoduodenectomy or pancreaticojejunosotomy, we conclude that in the presence of a dilated duct, the procedure of choice is pancreaticojejunostomy. If the duct is not dilated, we then favor pancreatoduodenectomy, after which the pain relief is significantly better (p = 0.05) than after distal resection. Our data show that, for all factors evaluated, the poorest pain relief was obtained after distal resection. Therefore that procedure has limited value when used specifically for relief of pain in chronic pancreatitis, except in the uncommon circumstance when the disease is confined to the distal part of the gland. Our study also shows that patients who have more radical distal resection have no better pain relief than those who have 50 percent distal resection.
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000601:surgery; D002908:Chronic Disease; D004108:Dilatation, Pathologic; D004386:Duodenum / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007583:Jejunum / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008722:Methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D059408:Pain Management; D010180:Pancreatectomy; D010183:Pancreatic Ducts / Q000601:surgery*; D010195:Pancreatitis / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*