Validating the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale cross-specialty alignment. A survey of double-boarded physicians.
In 1992, Medicare changed significantly how it paid physicians: instead of basing payment rates on charges, the federal government established a fee schedule based on the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS). Central to the development of the RBRVS was the methodology used to align the work of all specialties onto a single, common scale, termed "cross-specialty alignment." This article presents the methods and results of an alternative approach to cross-specialty alignment. We surveyed physicians who were board certified in both pathology and internal medicine (double-boarded) and asked them about the work of services in both specialties. The results provide a natural bridge between the work of the two specialties. The double-boarded survey results agreed closely with the RBRVS findings. Furthermore, the findings were robust after weighting the estimates by how frequently a physician performs a service or after grouping the physicians by the mix of services in their practice. We conclude that the relative work positions of pathology and internal medicine in the RBRVS have validity. Our findings suggest that a survey of physicians with expertise in multiple specialties is a useful approach for developing cross-specialty linkages for an RBRVS or for validating existing linkages.
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003625:Data Collection; D004470:Economics, Medical; D005245:Fee Schedules; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007388:Internal Medicine; D008297:Male; D016345:Medicare Part B / Q000639:trends*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010336:Pathology; D015895:Relative Value Scales; D013038:Specialization; D013044:Specialty Boards; D014481:United States