Rightward orienting bias, wheelchair maneuvering, and fall risk.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether rightward orienting bias, without neglect of left hemispace, increased accident risk.


METHODS
Case-control study.


METHODS
Inpatient rehabilitation unit of department of government medical center.


METHODS
Successive right-cerebrovascular accident (CVA) admissions were reviewed over a 2-year period. Only patients with left hemisphere damage, recent abusive drinking, dementia, or inpatient stays of less than 3 weeks were excluded. Fifty-five right-CVA subjects were divided into three groups, based on starting point and omissions in left hemispace on the Rey-Osterreith Complex Figure Drawing and Random Letter Cancellation test. Thirty-two patients were placed in the L-OMIT group (omitted stimuli in left hemispace), 11 patients were placed in the R-BIAS group (began tasks to the right without omissions), and 12 patients were placed in the Non-Neglect Stroke group (no evidence of unilateral neglect). Twenty male inpatients with no history of brain damage served as controls (Normal Control).


METHODS
Frequency of hospital falls and wheelchair obstacle course contacts.


RESULTS
Both the L-OMIT and the R-BIAS groups had more inpatient falls than the other groups F(3,71) = 6.11, p < .001. On the wheelchair obstacle course, the L-OMIT group made more left-sided wheelchair collisions than any other group. However, the R-BIAS group also made more errors than the Non-Neglect Stroke and the Normal Control groups, F(3,55) = 5.72, p < .01).


CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that rightward orienting bias has clinical significance, even without more serious symptoms of unilateral neglect.
D000058:Accidental Falls; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D002561:Cerebrovascular Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D014910:Wheelchairs