Comparison of three psychophysical techniques for estimating body-size perception.
Perception of body size was recorded for 63 university students (M age = 25.3 yr., 41 women) who estimated their own body size using three methods. Using the method of adjustment, subjects over- or underestimated their body size. A signal-detection analysis indicated that subjects were sensitive to detecting a 4% distortion in body size and that there was no systematic bias for reporting distortion as present or absent. Scores on the adaptive probit estimation task were significantly correlated with values for point of subjective equality and the size judgements with the method of adjustment. Over-all, this experiment demonstrated adaptive probit estimation as a reliable indicator of perceived body size, sensitivity in detecting size distortion, and response bias in making body-size judgements.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001824:Body Constitution; D001828:Body Image; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008838:Microcomputers; D008875:Middle Aged; D010469:Perceptual Distortion; D014741:Video Recording