Fashioning a work-based strategy for welfare reform based on international human rights doctrine.
The role of work in debates over welfare reform in the United States is analyzed. Five issues are identified and discussed under this heading, with special emphasis on the question of whether enough jobs exist to make it possible for all able-bodied welfare recipients to find paid employment in the regular labor market. It is argued that there are not enough jobs available--not even low-wage jobs--to make this a reasonable goal, and that neither conservatives nor liberals have faced up to the dilemma posed by this job shortage. International human rights doctrine concerning the availability of work at decent wages is cited in support of the proposition that the government should be held accountable for filling this job gap, not only for welfare recipients but for all other job-seekers as well. The costs of a hypothetical jobs program capable of achieving this goal are assessed, with the surprising result that it might actually save the public money. It is suggested that such a program could constitute an effective alternative to current welfare reform proposals.
D000385:Aid to Families with Dependent Children / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000458:organization & administration; D002648:Child; D002669:Child Welfare; D002961:Civil Rights; D004651:Employment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits; D014481:United States