title: Comparison of the responses to moving texture patterns of simple and complex cells in the cat's area 17.
abstract: 1. Whether complex (C) cells are the only truly texture-sensitive units in the cat's primary visual cortex remains controversial. In view of the strong physiological significance of having putatively only one class of cells sensitive to visual noise in the striate cortex, we reinvestigated this issue. Sensitivities of simple (S) and C cells to noise were quantitatively studied and compared in order to clearly document the response properties of cells in the striate cortex to visual noise and to establish whether one can unequivocally segregate S from C cells on the basis of those specific properties. 2. Receptive fields were stimulated with all relevant stimuli, i.e., drifting sine-wave gratings, electronically generated noise pattern of 256 x 256 elements (ratio 1:1 of dark and light elements), and flashing and moving bars (both bright and dark). 3. A total of 60 S cells out of 85 (70.6%) and 90 C cells out of 101 (81.8%) responded to the motion of visual noise. Responses of most C cells were sustained, i.e., their discharge rate was maintained at a constant level throughout presentation of the stimulus. On the other hand, responses of the majority of S cells were characterized by several bursts of discharges. On average, optimal firing rates were greater for gratings than for noise. 4. For practically all cells, responses to noise varied as a function of direction of motion. The mean direction bandwidths were, respectively, 43 +/- 24 degrees and 48 +/- 23 degrees (mean +/- SD) for S and C cells. In both groups, neurons were more broadly tuned for the direction of noise than that of gratings (t-test, P < 0.001). We rarely observed bimodal tuning curves for noise, with each peak lying on either side of the orientation curve. These results could be expected if one considers texture stimuli not in the space domain (as dot patterns) but in the frequency domain, i.e., patterns containing all spatial frequencies and orientations. 5. In general, the direction indexes of S and C cells were similar whether they were stimulated by drifting noise or gratings. S cells had a slight tendency to be more direction selective for noise than for gratings. 6. For all S and C cells tested, responses to noise varied as a function of drift velocity. The mean optimal velocity was 12.9 and 10.2 degrees/s for S and C cells, respectively (t-test, P > 0.05). Most cells were band-pass with mean bandwidths of 2.2 and 2.7 octaves for S and C cells, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D002452:Cell Count; D002468:Cell Physiological Phenomena; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D007700:Kinetics; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D009622:Noise; D009949:Orientation; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000502:physiology*