Accuracy of automated DNA sequencing: a multi-laboratory comparison of sequencing results.
A double-stranded (ds)DNA template of "unknown" sequence was distributed to approximately 80 core DNA sequencing laboratories by the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) for automated DNA sequence analysis. Forty-four different facilities responded with 83 usable sequence submissions. These sequences were grouped by both sequencing protocol (dye-primer or dye-terminator) and whether manually edited or not. The sequences were aligned with the known sequence, and the number of correct base calls, insertions, deletions, no-calls and miscalls were determined for each group. The dye-primer sequencing protocol provided the longest and most accurate sequence. The edited dye-primer data were > 95% accurate out to 400-450 bp, while the edited dye-terminator data could call only 300-350 bases at this accuracy. However, 75% of the laboratories in this sampling preferred the dye-terminator protocol, presumably because of its versatility and convenience. Laboratories that manually edited the automatically called data were able to obtain an additional 100 bases of good sequence when the dye-primer protocol was used. Surprisingly though, editing of dye-terminator results did not increase the amount of good sequence, although the dye-terminator protocol had a superior base-calling ability within the first 100 bases of called sequence.
D001322:Autoanalysis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D001482:Base Composition; D004396:Coloring Agents; D004247:DNA / Q000737:chemistry; D017931:DNA Primers; D007753:Laboratories / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013698:Templates, Genetic
D004396:Coloring Agents; D017931:DNA Primers; D004247:DNA