title: Comparison of two techniques to measure the motor nerve conduction velocity distribution.
abstract: Hopf's technique to measure the distribution of motor nerve conduction velocities (DMCV) has been compared with the technique introduced by Ingram et al. in the peroneal nerve of 28 healthy subjects 41.2 (S.D. 8.4) years. Twenty subjects were examined twice. Both techniques yielded an equal DMCV and equally reproducible results. Group mean velocities for the slowest examined (MNCV95) motor nerve fibres were 39.0 m/sec (S.D. 3.3) for Ingram's technique and 38.6 (S.D. 3.6) for Hopf's technique. The conventional MNCV was always slower than the velocity of the 5% fastest fibres estimated from the DMCV. Ingram's technique may have a number of merits which may have been obscured by measurement in the peroneal nerve, which may be of advantage in shorter nerve segments or faster nerve fibres. On the basis of our data in the peroneal nerve of healthy subjects no preference can be given for either of the techniques.
authors.affiliation: Coronel Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: M W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Ruijten
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Sallé
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kingma
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009132:Muscles / Q000294:innervation*; D009431:Neural Conduction / Q000502:physiology*; D010543:Peroneal Nerve / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results