title: Evolution of the rDNA spacer, ITS 2, in the ticks Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae).
abstract: Evolution of the rDNA spacer, ITS 2, is examined by comparing 17 DNA sequences of the ticks, Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus. The distribution of fixed interspecific differences and the relative frequency of base changes vs. insertions/deletions (indels) matches the distribution and relative frequency for intraspecifically variable sites. This suggests that most intraspecific variation is not effectively selected against. The base composition of the ITS 2 transcript is G- and U-biased. But, 5-base regions enriched (> 80 per cent) for A or U occur more frequently than expected while G- and C-enriched regions occur less frequently than expected. Enriched sequences may be prone to replication slippage, accounting for the A/T bias in insertions. Slippage-mediated gains and losses of A/T-rich tandem repeats apparently account for most indels. Minimum-energy conformations of the two species' folded transcripts share major structural features. Structural inertia arises from intramolecular base pairing within stems that allows most mutations to be absorbed as new bulges off stems. Yet, there is evidence of selection to maintain the conformation. First, intraspecifically variable sites are concentrated at the ends of stems in loops and intersections, structures that do not contribute to intramolecular base pairing. Moreover, some indels that have become fixed in one species compensate for the presence of conformation-destabilizing indels. However, high rates of sequence evolution within stems and absence of compensatory base evolution contraindicates selective constraint. Degenerate dispersed and tandem copies of two subrepeats, each approximately 20 bases long, may account for much of the ITS 2 sequence. These are approximately inverses of each other and are, consequently, capable of significant intramolecular hydrogen bonding to produce folded transcripts of low energy. Evolution of the ITS 2 sequence may largely entail replication slippage-mediated gains and losses of these repeats or their composite subrepeats.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro 30460-8042, USA.
authors.forename: D K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: McLain
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Wesson
authors.forename: F H
authors.initials: FH
authors.lastname: Collins
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Oliver
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001482:Base Composition; D001483:Base Sequence; D005075:Biological Evolution; D016384:Consensus Sequence; D017931:DNA Primers / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D004251:DNA Transposable Elements; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal / Q000235:genetics*; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation; D012091:Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid; D017421:Sequence Analysis; D017384:Sequence Deletion; D013987:Ticks / Q000235:genetics*; D014158:Transcription, Genetic
chemical_list: D017931:DNA Primers; D004251:DNA Transposable Elements; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal