title: Source of stem cells impacts on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy.
abstract: The restoration of hematopoiesis after high-dose chemotherapy may be accelerated by the use of stem cells from the bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood. Numerous reports utilizing mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) for stem cell rescue have shown that PBPC are sufficient to restore hematopoiesis, but there are little data comparing the recovery among patients treated with various stem cell sources. We reviewed the clinical outcomes of 69 women at our institution who were treated for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with high-dose cyclophosphamide (CY) and thiotepa and autologous stem cell and growth factor support. Of the 43 patients with normal BM, 19 received BM alone and 24 received BM plus G-CSF mobilized PBPC. Of the 26 patients with evidence of metastatic disease in the BM, or evidence of fibrosis and hypocellularity, 15 received CY-mobilized PBPC and 11 received CY/G-CSF-mobilized PBPC. Of the marrow-negative patients, those receiving BM alone had significantly longer (P < 0.001) granulocyte recovery (absolute neutrophil count > 500 x 10(6)/l) and platelet recovery (platelets > 50 x 10(9)/l) compared with BM + G-CSF-mobilized PBPC. They also had significantly longer (P < 0.001) durations of antibiotic and amphotericin usage, increased transfusion requirements and longer hospitalizations. Of the marrow-positive patients, there was a slightly shortened granulocyte recovery, shortened hospital stays and lessened amphotericin usage in the patients who received CY/G-CSF-mobilized PBPC compared with the CY-mobilized patients. Although the number of harvested mononuclear cells differed significantly between the groups, this did not correlate with the time to hematopoietic recovery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
authors.forename: T M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Zimmerman
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mick
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Myers
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Bender
authors.forename: W J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: S F
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D018952:Antigens, CD34 / Q000032:analysis; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D016026:Bone Marrow Transplantation; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy; D003520:Cyclophosphamide / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006085:Graft Survival; D016179:Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006410:Hematopoiesis / Q000187:drug effects; D018380:Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; D006801:Humans; D007958:Leukocyte Count; D015993:Life Tables; D009928:Organ Specificity; D010976:Platelet Count; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011994:Recombinant Proteins / Q000627:therapeutic use; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013852:Thiotepa / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D018952:Antigens, CD34; D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D016179:Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; D003520:Cyclophosphamide; D013852:Thiotepa