title: Gender differences in moral reasoning among physicians, registered nurses and enrolled nurses engaged in geriatric and surgical care.
abstract: Physicians, registered nurses (RNs) and enrolled nurses (ENs) engaged in geriatric (n = 49) and surgical (n = 59) care at a large hospital in Sweden gave 180 accounts of morally difficult care episodes. In total, the ENs (n = 40) gave 78, the RNs (n = 38) 55 and the physicians (n = 30) 47 accounts; there were 83 from geriatric care and 97 from surgical care. Forty-nine participants were male, and 59 were female; there were no differences in gender in the form and content of the moral reasoning disclosed in either morally difficult care episodes or in the complete interviews when coded as mainly narrative or propositional, or as showing a care or a justice orientation. The ENs showed a care orientation, while RNs and physicians, to an equal degree, showed both a justice and a care orientation. The ENs also used narrative reasoning more often than RNs and physicians. No differences were seen between the two health care specialties.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Norberg
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Udén
mesh_terms: D026689:Ethical Analysis; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D005260:Female; D013502:General Surgery; D005853:Geriatrics; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D008297:Male; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology*; D035863:Moral Development; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology*; D009743:Nursing, Practical; D012737:Sex Factors