title: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A useful tool for the otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To review our series of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement by the Division of Otolaryngology.
  
  
  METHODS
  Charts from a total of 29 patients were reviewed; 23 patients with head and neck cancer and six patients with chronic aspiration.
  
  
  METHODS
  Placement of a PEG tube and other associated procedures, including primary tumor resection, tracheostomy, and surgical endoscopy.
  
  
  METHODS
  The feasibility, morbidity, and mortality of PEGs performed at the time of the primary surgical procedure compared with those being performed with a minor procedure.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In almost all cases, the PEG was performed in conjunction with another procedure requiring general anesthesia, thereby decreasing the total number of procedure days. Morbidity and mortality were absent for all patients in whom PEG was performed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  When properly applied, PEG can be performed by the otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon with minimal or no morbidity at the time of staging or definitive procedure. Thus, the PEG can be of great benefit in patients with head and neck cancer.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, USA.
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Selz
authors.forename: P M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Santos
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016099:Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D004750:Enteral Nutrition; D005774:Gastrostomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007441:Intubation, Gastrointestinal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010036:Otolaryngology / Q000379:methods*