title: The effect of fixed payment on hospital costs.
abstract: New Medicare regulations have replaced the cost-based system of reimbursement of capital expenditures by hospitals with a fixed payment per case based on assigned diagnostic-related groups. For the first time, hospitals must pay the governmental share of their capital costs. At the same time, overall reform points toward more capitation or fixed payments from all payers. This article discusses possible responses to legislative and competitive reforms by hospital management and the resulting effectiveness of the changes. To identify the potential effect of capital payment reform, we highlight some of the key provisions and assumptions of the new regulations, discuss the management implications of a changed capital payment system, and explore alternative models of hospital investment behavior in a world where one price for services for all buyers is a probable scenario.
authors.affiliation: Case Western Reserve University, USA.
authors.forename: R T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: Kauer
authors.forename: J B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Silvers
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Teplensky
mesh_terms: D002017:Budgets; D002204:Capitation Fee; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups / Q000191:economics; D005377:Financial Management, Hospital / Q000639:trends*; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000191:economics*; D006291:Health Policy; D017721:Hospital Costs / Q000639:trends*; D007449:Investments; D006278:Medicare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D018803:Models, Economic; D011445:Prospective Payment System; D012308:Risk Management; D014481:United States