title: Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the process and outcome of "primary care" consultations undertaken by senior house officers, registrars, and general practitioners in an accident and emergency department.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective, controlled intervention study.
  
  
  METHODS
  A busy, inner city accident and emergency department in south London.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients treated during a stratified random sample of 419 three hour sessions between June 1989 and May 1990 assessed at nurse triage as presenting with problems that could be treated in a primary care setting. 1702 of these patients were treated by sessionally employed local general practitioners, 2382 by senior house officers, and 557 by registrars.
  
  
  METHODS
  Process variables: laboratory and radiographic investigations, prescriptions, and referrals; outcome variables: results of investigations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Primary care consultations made by accident and emergency medical staff resulted in greater utilisation of investigative, outpatient, and specialist services than those made by general practitioners. For example, the odds ratios for patients receiving radiography were 2.78 (95% confidence interval 2.32 to 3.34) for senior house officer v general practitioner consultations and 2.37 (1.84 to 3.06) for registrars v general practitioners. For referral to hospital specialist on call teams or outpatient departments v discharge to the community the odds ratios were 2.88 (2.39 to 3.47) for senior house officers v general practitioners and 2.57 (1.98 to 3.35) for registrars v general practitioners.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Employing general practitioners in accident and emergency departments to manage patients with primary care needs seems to result in reduced rates of investigations, prescriptions, and referrals. This suggests important benefits in terms of resource utilisation, but the impact on patient outcome and satisfaction needs to be considered further.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dale
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Green
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Reid
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Glucksman
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Higgs
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D006786:Hospitals, Urban / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008131:London; D008297:Male; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital; D008875:Middle Aged; D016017:Odds Ratio; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D014218:Triage