title: Desmin expression in rhabdomyosarcoma: influence of the desmin clone and immunohistochemical method.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine which, if any, of five commercially available desmin clones is most reliable at labelling desmin filaments and whether the enhanced polymer one step (EPOS) method of labelling is of any advantage in the routine diagnostic laboratory.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty four rhabdomyosarcomas from the files at The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London, were studied. Four different desmin clones, DE-R-11, D33, DE-U-10, and PDE, were applied to each using the conventional extravidin biotin peroxidase method. The D33 clone was also applied using the EPOS method.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The EPOS method incorporating D33 persistently scored more cells as desmin positive and was positive in four cases which were negative on staining with the other clones.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The D33 desmin clone used with the EPOS method is more reliable for identifying desmin filaments in tumours than other desmin antibodies tested. Different desmin clones using a routine technique label different rhabdomyosarcoma cells and therefore it is justifiable to use more than one clone.
authors.affiliation: Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children NHS Trust, London.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pollock
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rampling
authors.forename: S E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Greenwald
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Malone
mesh_terms: D003893:Desmin / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry / Q000379:methods*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; D012208:Rhabdomyosarcoma / Q000175:diagnosis*
chemical_list: D003893:Desmin; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic