Publication probability of a study on odds ratio value circumstantial evidence for publication bias in medical study areas.
A summarized odds ratio, calculated from odds ratios of published studies in a meta-analysis, may be overestimated because of publication bias. A method has been developed estimating indirectly the summarized odds ratio of all studies in a given research area, including not only those published but also unpublished. In the present study, a publication probability according to odds ratio value was obtained from the probability density function of all the studies, and a histogram of those published. A publication probability, according to odds ratio value, enables us to infer the quantitative relationship between publication probability and odds ratio. A notable nonpublication of studies whose odds ratios were close to unity was shown from examples of studies on the relationship between passive smoking and lung cancer, whereas nonpublication of studies whose summarized odds ratio was located far from unity was not detected from examples of studies on the relationship between cryptorchidism and testicular cancer. In both study areas, however, the differences between the summarized odds ratios, either with or without the hypothetical unpublished studies, were not large. The small difference, however, should not be ignored, when the study area is recognized as a social problem.
Sugita
M
M
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yamaguchi
N
N
Izuno
T
T
Kanamori
M
M
Kasuga
H
H
D003456:Cryptorchidism / Q000150:complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000453:epidemiology; D008297:Male; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D016017:Odds Ratio; D017594:Publication Bias; D013736:Testicular Neoplasms / Q000150:complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000009:adverse effects
D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution