title: Underdetermination.
abstract: When trying to assess the implications of recent deep shifts in the philosophy of science for the broader arena of medicine, the theme that most readily comes to mind is underdetermination. In scientific research one always hopes for determination: that the world should determine the observations we make of it; that evidence should determine the theories we adopt; that the practice of science should determine results independent of the sort of society in which that practice takes place. In this essay, doubts cast on each of these ideas by recent work in philosophy of science will be discussed and the consequences for philosophy of medicine will be indicated.
authors.affiliation: Program in History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: McMullin
mesh_terms: D049670:History, 17th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D008128:Logic; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history; D010686:Philosophy, Medical / Q000266:history; D012586:Science; D012660:Semantics; D012942:Social Sciences / Q000266:history