Big bang health care reform--does it work?: the case of Britain's 1991 National Health Service reforms.
The costs and benefits are examined of one of the very few examples of a government driving through health care reform in the face of near unanimous opposition: Britain's 1991 reforms of the National Health Service (NHS), which sought to inject the dynamics of a market into the framework of a universal, tax-financed service. The political costs to the government have been high. The public continues to see the NHS through the eyes of disgruntled doctors and nurses. The benefits, measured in efficiency gains or service improvements, are as yet difficult to establish. However, the NHS has changed in key respects. The balance has shifted from hospital specialists to general practitioners and from providers to purchasers, with increasing emphasis on professional accountability and consumerism. But the NHS continues to evolve as it strives to resolve the tensions implicit in the reforms, and the only certainty is that no future government can return to the pre-1991 situation.
Klein
R
R
Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy, School of Social Sciences, University of Bath, England.
D003284:Contract Services; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005194:Family Practice; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011332:Privatization; D013222:State Medicine / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006113:United Kingdom