[Cardiac death and acute myocardial infarct after psychological or physical stress--causality questions and insurance law].
Often, it is the question to the medical expert, if there is a causality in the lawful sense from professional effort or psychical stress to acute coronary death or acute myocardial infarction. Following the German social law the connection has to be probably. Probability is well defined juridically opposite to possibility. The medical expert has to answer if the physical or psychical stress has caused the fatality or not more than manifested. Here are discussed arguments that the atheromatosis of the coronary vessels has much more importance than the manifestation of acute death or myocardial infarction caused by spasmus. There is no evidence for the existence of spastic genesis without any arteriosclerotic focus.
Fritze
E
E
Chefarzt der Medizin. Univ. Klinik Bergmannsheil, Bochum.
Müller
K M
KM
D015984:Causality; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000401:mortality; D016757:Death, Sudden, Cardiac / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology*; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007346:Insurance, Accident / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000401:mortality*; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000401:mortality*; D012307:Risk Factors; D013312:Stress, Physiological / Q000150:complications*; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000150:complications*
Herztod und akuter Myokardinfarkt nach psychischen oder physischen Belastungen--Kausalitätsfragen und Versicherungsrecht.