Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners.
OBJECTIVE
One of the more difficult tasks that clinicians must perform as part of their care of patients is that of conveying bad news, such as a severe diagnosis or death. However, there is a paucity of empirically founded information that relates to the specific steps for breaking bad news. We report on a set of guidelines for breaking bad news that was developed using a consensus process and incorporates the views of medical oncologists, general practitioners, surgeons, nurse consultants, social workers, clergy, human rights representatives, cancer patients, hospital interns, and clinical directors of medical schools in Australia.


CONCLUSIONS
It is recommended that further research be undertaken in a number of areas. First, there is a need to assess patients' versus providers' perceptions of the importance of each of the steps in breaking bad news, in order to define criteria for minimal levels of competence in this area. Second, controlled trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of the guidelines in changing clinical practice, and to identify the most effective strategies for breaking bad news to patients.
Girgis
A
A
New South Wales Cancer Council Cancer Education Research Program, Newcastle, Australia.
Sanson-Fisher
R W
RW
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D032882:Comprehension; D003219:Confidentiality; D006801:Humans; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000379:methods; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D014342:Truth Disclosure