title: [Radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of technics].
abstract: Today we may consider radical perineal prostatectomy as an example of mild invasive surgery compared with the retropubic. Technique is found less traumatic account of the precision of the approach, the accuracy of hemostasis and urethral bladder suture and the speed of postoperative handling. The only disadvantage related with the impossibility of transperineal pathological lymph node staging can today be satisfactory overcome after the advent of laparoscopic lymph node methods which permits safe non invasive preoperative hystological examination. The authors show the technique of laparoscopic and surgical therapy, concluding that perineal prostatectomy is a better approach toward retropubic radical prostatectomy, if combined with preoperative laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
authors.affiliation: Istituto di Urologia dell'Università di Milano.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Austoni
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Zanetti
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ceresoli
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Del Nero
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Mantovani
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Fenice
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010502:Perineum; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*
vernacular_title: Prostatectomia radicale perineale e retropubica: tecniche a confronto.