title: A comparison of recruitment methods for an osteoarthritis exercise study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Patient recruitment often involves a great deal of effort and cost. We sought to determine successful recruitment methods for an osteoarthritis (OA) exercise study, and to subsequently focus on using those approaches.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eleven methods were developed to recruit subjects for this large research project. Financial constraints ensured that we focused on low-cost measures. Over a 20-month period, the numbers of both total respondents and eventual participants were recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Responses were recorded for 263 individuals, and 108 subjects entered the study. The most successful recruitment method was via physician referrals from affiliated clinics. In general, methods that were free of direct cost seemed no less successful than those requiring expenditures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Successful subject recruitment, even for a large study, may not require costly advertising. Direct contact and frequent reminders rendered to our own clinics proved most effective, but other free and low-cost approaches were also of benefit.
authors.forename: B T
authors.initials: BT
authors.lastname: Maurer
authors.forename: S I
authors.initials: SI
authors.lastname: Moreno
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Pickard
authors.forename: B E
authors.initials: BE
authors.lastname: Wurst
authors.forename: D K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Norden
authors.forename: H R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Schumacher
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005081:Exercise Therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010003:Osteoarthritis / Q000628:therapy*; D018579:Patient Selection; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012017:Referral and Consultation