Properties of superior vestibular nucleus flocculus target neurons in the squirrel monkey. I. General properties in comparison with flocculus projecting neurons.
1. Using single-unit recording and microstimulation methods, a group of flocculus target neurons (FTNs) were identified in the superior vestibular nucleus (SVN) and were studied using visual-vestibular interaction paradigms in alert squirrel monkeys. The response properties of these FTNs were characterized and compared with those of flocculus projecting neurons (FPNs). 2. FTNs were monosynaptically inhibited by single-pulse flocculus stimulation. The mean inhibition latency was 1.0 +/- 0.57 (SD) ms (n = 40) and the mean inhibition period was 6.7 +/- 2.69 ms. FTNs were also monosynaptically activated by VIIIth nerve stimulation. The mean response latency was 1.10 +/- 0.25 ms (n = 12). This is about the same as that of the FPNs (1.14 +/- 0.16 ms, n = 17). 3. The most characteristic response property of the FTNs is their firing rate modulation during visual following eye movements induced by sinusoidal rotation of an optokinetic drum at 0.5 Hz. This modulation was mainly related to eye velocity and was therefore termed a visual following eye velocity signal. The average eye velocity gain for all FTNs is 0.79 spikes.s-1.deg-1.s-1. In contrast, the responses of FPNs were not modulated under the same conditions. 4. Even though FTNs are inhibited by the flocculus, they have a relatively higher mean firing rate (124 +/- 23 spikes/s, n = 45) than FPNs (66 +/- 28 spikes/s, n = 42). The underlying mechanism may be related to commissural facilitation of FTNs and commissural inhibition of FPNs. 5. Thirty FTNs were identified as upward eye velocity FTNs because their firing rate increased for upward eye velocity during a visual following eye movement. The mean eye velocity sensitivity was 1.09 spikes.s-1.deg-1.s-1. Most of these cells also modulated during vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in the dark, with firing rate increasing for downward head velocity. During VOR suppression the firing rate either did not modulate or modulated in phase with head or drum velocity with a smaller amplitude in comparison with the response during visual following. For all cells (with 1 exception) the response during a visual following eye movement can be approximately predicted by a linear vectorial subtraction of the response during VOR suppression and the response during VOR in the dark [modulation response vector of FTNs during visual following of the optokinetic stimulus (OKR) approximately modulation response vector of FTNs during VOR suppression-modulation response vector of FTNs during VOR in the dark].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Zhang
Y
Y
Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Partsalis
A M
AM
Highstein
S M
SM
D000818:Animals; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D012453:Saimiri; D013997:Time Factors; D014726:Vestibular Nuclei / Q000502:physiology*