title: Single-slide versus double-slide Pap smear: a comparative study.
abstract: Comparison of the single-slide versus double-slide Pap smear method was performed using ectocervical and endocervical samples taken with the Ayre spatula and Cytobrush and placed together on one slide or on two separate slides. Eight hundred cases were collected by four different physicians in a gynecologic clinic (100 consecutive cases per doctor per method). All samples were evaluated at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Parameters evaluated were: specimen adequacy, quality and detection of disease. Results for the double-slide method were: 352/400 (88%) satisfactory, 48/400 (12%) satisfactory, but limited, and 0% unsatisfactory cases. Results for the single-slide method were: 347/400 (86.7%) satisfactory, 50/400 (12.5%) satisfactory, but limited, and 3/400 (0.75%) unsatisfactory cases. Results regarding detection of disease were 16/400 (4%) CIN 1/400 (0.25%) carcinomas with the double-slide method as compared to 13/400 (3.25%) CIN and no carcinomas with the single-slide method. No statistically significant differences were found regarding specimen adequacy (P = 0.31), quality (P = 1.00), and detection of disease [CIN (P = 0.71) and carcinomas (P = 1.0)]. These preliminary findings suggest that the single-slide method is as efficacious as the double-slide method, although a larger group of patients with a longer follow-up need to be evaluated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cytopathology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
authors.forename: V L
authors.initials: VL
authors.lastname: Saitas
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hawthorne
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Cater
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bibbo
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006652:Histological Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation; D006654:Histology, Comparative; D006801:Humans; D065006:Papanicolaou Test; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000379:methods*