A comparison of methods for calibrating parallel-plate chambers/.
All dosimetry protocols for calibrating the output of electron beams recommend the use of parallel-plate ionization chambers, but the method of determining their value of Ngas is a matter of concern. The AAPM Protocol (TG 21) recommends a direct comparison with a calibrated cylindrical chamber in phantom at dmax with the highest available electron energy beam. This must be done by the user. Since all calibration laboratories traditionally use 60Co for megavoltage chamber calibrations, two alternate procedures based on exposures in-air, or in-phantom, have been proposed. All methods use correction factors in the data reduction. To verify the consistency of the three methods, we have measured Ngas using each of these techniques for six of the most commonly used and commercially-available parallel-plate ionization chambers. The paired cylindrical and parallel-plate ionization chambers, and phantom materials/buildup caps were matched to the wall composition of the plane chambers, as recommended in TG 39. A 22 MeV electron beam was used for the electron irradiations. The ionization chambers were then taken to an Accredited Dosimetry Calibration Laboratory (ADCL), where 60Co calibrations were performed. The results demonstrate that, by using the appropriate correction factors for the chambers described in this work, all three methods yield values for Ngas that are within 1% of each other.
Reft
C S
CS
University of Chicago, Illinois 60637.
Kuchnir
F T
FT
DeWerd
L A
LA
Micka
J
J
Attix
F H
FH
D055592:Biophysical Phenomena; D001703:Biophysics; D003037:Cobalt Radioisotopes / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004583:Electrons; D006801:Humans; D008961:Models, Structural; D011874:Radiometry / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011882:Radiotherapy, High-Energy / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
D003037:Cobalt Radioisotopes