title: Centrifugation of human spermatozoa induces sublethal damage; separation of human spermatozoa from seminal plasma by a dextran swim-up procedure without centrifugation extends their motile lifetime.
abstract: While washing of human sperm cells by centrifugation and resuspension is a procedure in widespread use, there have been indications that this procedure per se may be harmful to the cells. The objective of this study was to investigate this question. To this end, a method for the clean separation of motile human spermatozoa from seminal plasma in the absence of centrifugation was developed, using a modified swim-up procedure, in which liquefied semen was mixed with an equal volume of 30 mg/ml dextran in medium, and the mixture overlaid with medium containing 5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, forming two discreet layers with stable interface. The percentage of motile cells in a given sample was consistently > 80% immediately after recovery. Damage to the cells was assessed by loss of motile cells during incubation up to 96 h post-recovery. Comparison of aliquots of spermatozoa obtained by the dextran swim-up procedure showed that the aliquot subjected to centrifugation had 4 +/- 3% motile cells after 48 h, while the untreated aliquot had 52 +/- 12%. The aliquots showed no difference 1 h post-recovery. Similar results were obtained with spermatozoa that had been centrifuged in seminal plasma and resuspended in fresh plasma, then recovered by dextran swim-up. The delayed onset of motility loss in the centrifuged samples implies that this treatment induces sublethal damage in the cells. Comparison of the standard swim-up and Percoll gradient methods for sperm recovery, both of which involve centrifugation steps, showed decline in motility of the samples similar to that seen with dextran swim-up of centrifuged cells. We conclude that centrifugation per se induces sublethal damage in human spermatozoa, independently of treatment method, and suggest that recovery methods for human spermatozoa which avoid centrifugation might partially alleviate the damage incurred by these cells during cryopreservation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia 19104-4283.
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Alvarez
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Lasso
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Blasco
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Nuñez
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Heyner
authors.forename: P P
authors.initials: PP
authors.lastname: Caballero
authors.forename: B T
authors.initials: BT
authors.lastname: Storey
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002469:Cell Separation; D002498:Centrifugation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D003911:Dextrans; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012661:Semen / Q000166:cytology*; D013076:Sperm Count; D013081:Sperm Motility / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D003911:Dextrans