Causal reasoning and the diagnostic process.
BACKGROUND
Causal reasoning as a way to make a diagnosis seems convincing. Modern medicine depends on the search for causes of disease and it seems fair to assert that such knowledge is employed in diagnosis. Causal reasoning as it has been presented neglects to some extent the conception of multifactorial disease causes.


OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this paper is to analyze aspects of causation relevant for discussing causal reasoning in a diagnostic context.


METHODS
The analysis will discuss different conceptions of causal reasoning in medical diagnosis, discriminating primarily between narrow causal diagnosis and more thorough causal explanation. The theory of causes as non-redundant factors in effective causal complexes is used as an analytical background. Causal explanations are performed according to different causal models. Such models of diagnosis are assumptions concerning structure and mechanisms, which cannot be directly or immediately observed. Conceptions and results of causal search strategies differ, according to the focus of the searcher. Causal reasoning is also seen in diagnosis in a more extensive meaning: the pin-pointing of factors responsible for the condition of the patient at any time during the course of disease.


CONCLUSIONS
Causal reasoning and diagnosis go well in hand, especially if both concepts are widened. The theory of causes as non-redundant components in effective causal complexes, modulated by what is referred to as the stop problem and causal fields, is valuable for explaining the many aspects of causal reasoning in medical diagnosis.
Rizzi
D A
DA
University of Copenhagen, Department of Medical Philosophy and Clinical Theory, Panum Institute, Denmark.
D015984:Causality; D003657:Decision Making; D003933:Diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D010686:Philosophy, Medical