title: Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures.
abstract: Experiments involving large-size, ill-defined categories were conducted to distinguish between the predictions of an exemplar model and linear and quadratic decision bound models. In conditions in which the optimal classification boundary was of a more complex form than the quadratic model, the exemplar model provided significantly better accounts of study participants' data than did the decision bound models, even in situations in which a linear bound would have yielded nearly optimal performance. The results suggest that participants are not predisposed or constrained to use linear or quadratic decision bounds for classifying multidimensional perceptual stimuli and that exemplar models may provide a parsimonious process-level account of the complex types of decision bounds used by experiment participants. The results also suggest some limitations on the complexity of the decision bounds that can be learned, in contrast to the predictions of the exemplar model.
authors.affiliation: Indiana University Bloomington 47405.
authors.forename: S C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: McKinley
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Nosofsky
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D015233:Models, Statistical; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011601:Psychophysics