Manuscript peer review at the AJR: facts, figures, and quality assessment.
Concern by the government, funding institutions, and the public for quality assurance in all aspects of medical endeavors mandates critical examination of various professional activities. Although peer review is generally regarded as the best system for selecting and improving scientific papers for publication, the efficacy of this process has never been proved. Moreover, the administrative functions of the editorial staff are often poorly understood. The purpose of this article is to make peer review a the AJR less esoteric and more understandable by quantifying some of its activities. This information is then assessed as it relates to the quality of this important step in scientific publication.
Friedman
D P
DP
Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000592:standards; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011786:Quality Control; D011871:Radiology