A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device.
A mouse was modified to add tactile feedback via a solenoid-driven pin projecting through a hole in the left mouse button. An experiment is described using a target selection task under five different sensory feedback conditions ('normal', auditory, colour, tactile, and combined). No differences were found in overall response times, error rates, or bandwidths; however, significant differences were found in the final positioning times (from the cursor entering the target to selecting the target). For the latter, tactile feedback was the quickest, normal feedback was the slowest. An examination of the spatial distributions in responses showed a peaked, narrow distribution for the normal condition, and a flat, wide distribution for the tactile (and combined) conditions. It is argued that tactile feedback allows subjects to use a wider area of the target and to select targets more quickly once the cursor is inside the target. Design considerations for human-computer interfaces are discussed.
Akamatsu
M
M
National Institute of Bioscience and Human-Technology, AIST, MITI, Japan.
MacKenzie
I S
IS
Hasbroucq
T
T
D001288:Attention; D001307:Auditory Perception; D016287:Computer Peripherals; D003626:Data Display; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D008838:Microcomputers; D009949:Orientation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time; D014110:Touch; D014584:User-Computer Interface; D014796:Visual Perception