Treatment preferences, return visit planning and factors affecting hypertension practice amongst general practitioners and internal medicine specialists (the General Practitioner Hypertension Practice Study)
OBJECTIVE
To study clinical practice and attitudes in hypertension care amongst general practitioners (GPs) and hospital internal medicine specialists.


METHODS
Mailed case report questionnaires.


METHODS
Ninety GPs and 69 internal medicine specialists at randomly selected primary health care centres and hospital outpatient departments.


METHODS
Case-bound treatment preferences, treatment goals and return visit planning, and views on factors influencing practice.


RESULTS
The participation rate was 84% and 70%, for GPs and internal medicine specialists, respectively. GPs more often proposed nonpharmacological therapy (P < 0.05), solely and as a complementary treatment, and prescribed more calcium antagonists (P < 0.001), whilst internal medicine specialists prescribed more ACE inhibitors (P < 0.001). Personal experience guides practice more than national consensus and economy, more so with increasing time since specialization.


CONCLUSIONS
GPs and internal medicine specialists in Sweden report a hypertension practice closely related to each others' and to the intentions of national guidelines.
Ribacke
M
M
Department of Family Medicine, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden.
D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000628:therapy*; D007388:Internal Medicine / Q000592:standards*; D009819:Office Visits; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000592:standards; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013548:Sweden