On the belief that one body may be host to two or more personalities.
The belief in the validity of the multiple personality concept is discussed in this article. Two scaffolding constructions are analyzed: dissociation and repression. As generally employed, these constructions grant no agency to the multiple personality patient. The claim is made that the conduct of interest arises in discourse, usually with the therapist as the discourse partner. In reviewing the history of multiple personality and the writings of current advocates, it becomes clear that contemporary users of the multiple personality disorder diagnosis participate in a subculture with its own set of myths, one of which is the autonomous actions of mental faculties. Of special significance is the readiness to transfigure imaginings into rememberings of child abuse, leading ultimately to the manufacture of persons. The implications for both therapy and theory of regarding the patient as agent in place of the belief that the contranormative conduct is under the control of mentalistic faculties are discussed.
Sarbin
T R
TR
University of California, Santa Cruz, USA.
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002649:Child Abuse / Q000523:psychology; D004213:Dissociative Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D009105:Dissociative Identity Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D006990:Hypnosis; D010553:Personality Development; D011613:Psychotherapy; D012094:Repression, Psychology