The power of social judgement: struggle and negotiation in the nursing process.
In this paper we discuss an alternative view of the nursing process as it is experienced by both patients and nurses. The current conception of the nursing process is that it is a benevolent activity which aims to render care more individualized or person-centred. Its rhetoric usually includes notions of mutuality in goal setting, openness and collaboration between patients and nurses. We will suggest that such a view is idealized and has little basis in empirical reality as it is experienced by both nurses and patients. Rather, nurse-patient relations are beset by conflict and struggle, frequently resulting in the acquiescence of patients to the nursing and the medical goals of care. On the basis of an ethnography of a hospital medical ward, we will describe a process of social judgement and set it into a discussion of the social context where an unequal balance of power is integral to provider-recipient relations. Our account will focus upon four categories through which judgemental labelling may be analysed. These are assessing, negotiation, struggling and acquiescing. Of special interest to us are strategies which nurses used to maintain excellent care in the context of negative social judgements, and the place social judgement may play in moral decision-making. We emphasize the strengths which rich qualitative data have in relation to previous survey approaches of this phenomenon, whilst recognising the limitations of so focused a study.
Johnson
M
M
Webb
C
C
D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D017008:Negotiating; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D009736:Nursing Process; D011209:Power, Psychological; D012938:Social Perception