A quick screening test of competency to stand trial for defendants with mental retardation.
19 terms and concepts from evaluations of competency to stand trial of 55 defendants with mental retardation were rated to examine whether a quick screening test could be devised that would differentiate those who were judged competent or not competent. A multiple regression and discriminant analysis gave four items that yielded maximum predictability (R = .84): court strategy, plead, testify, and jury. Guilty, trial, and prosecutor were also significantly more difficult for those who were not competent than those who were.
Smith
S A
SA
Department of Psychology, Pee Dee Regional Center, Florence, SC 29502, USA.
Hudson
R L
RL
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016002:Discriminant Analysis; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007298:Insanity Defense; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011594:Psychometrics; D012044:Regression Analysis