title: Does the method of transluminal coronary revascularisation influence re-stenosis? Balloon angioplasty, atherectomy and stents compared.
abstract: Luminal renarrowing after successful coronary angioplasty is now recognised as a continuously distributed process which is determined largely by the extent of luminal increase achieved at angioplasty. In this study an alternative analytical approach is applied to determine whether luminal renarrowing following coronary intervention is related to the mechanism of luminal increase (ie by balloon, by atherectomy, by a self-expanding stainless steel mesh stent, or by a balloon-expandable tantalum coil stent). The results confirm the known proportional relationship between luminal renarrowing during follow-up and luminal improvement at intervention, regardless of the device used. However, significant differences were observed between the devices, which may reflect device-specific characteristics of the hyperplastic response to vessel injury and may have clinical implications.
authors.affiliation: Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: D P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Foley
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Keane
authors.forename: P W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Serruys
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; D017225:Atherectomy, Coronary; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012008:Recurrence; D015607:Stents; D016896:Treatment Outcome