title: Alternating conformal neutron and photon irradiation for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
abstract: The substantial local failure rate for patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate (LACaP) following photon irradiation, the association of local failure with a poor prognosis, and the promising results of mixed neutron/photon (40%/60%) radiotherapy supplied the rationale for this study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combined advantages of mixed neutron/photon (75%/25%) irradiation, 3D treatment planning, as well as fully conformal beam shaping capabilities in reducing the morbidity associated with neutron irradiation. The first 35 patients treated with this technique are the basis for this analysis. After CT stimulation and treatment planning, the normal tissue and target structures were entered into the 3D planning system. The neutron dose was delivered in 15 fractions at 1.0 Gy/fraction (NGy) to the prostate and seminal vesicles (PSV) and 0.6 NGy/fraction to the pelvic lymph nodes (LN). The photon dose was given in 10 fractions of 1.8 Gy each to both the PSV and LN volumes. Neutron and photon dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated in each patient for the prostate, seminal vesicles, lymph nodes, bladder, and rectum. The adequacy of the neutron and photon components of the treatment were compared with respect to target volume and normal tissue irradiation. Based on the DVH analysis, the prostate and seminal vesicles received the prescribed dose with both neutrons (99% +/- 2%) and photons (99% +/- 2%). There was no significant difference in the dose to the bladder and rectum for both the neutrons and photons. The acute treatment related reactions have been mild, with only one grade III bladder reaction. The 3D conformal technology utilized in this study has been shown to allow for the delivery of neutron irradiation with no increase in dose to the adjacent normal tissues compared with that achieved with conformal photon treatment. Further follow-up will reveal whether the dosimetric advantage demonstrated by this technique translates into an improved therapeutic ratio.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
authors.forename: J D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Forman
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Warmelink
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Devi
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Court
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sharma
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Yudelev
authors.forename: A T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Porter
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Maughan
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000532:radiotherapy* / Q000556:secondary; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009502:Neutrons; D017785:Photons; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; D011882:Radiotherapy, High-Energy