Decision and attribution bias in neurorehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE
Examine neurorehabilitation therapists' clinical predictions and attributions for outcomes.


METHODS
Single sample, repeated measures.


METHODS
A sample of 51 neurorehabilitation therapists selected from representative disciplines including occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy, and recreation therapy.


METHODS
Self-report questionnaire on factors related to positive and negative outcomes in neurorehabilitation. Rank order listing of factors influencing outcome in neurorehabilitation.


RESULTS
Without cuing, therapists did not identify injury severity as factor in outcome (p < .0001). Therapists also made internal attributions for positive outcomes and external attributions for negative outcomes (p < .0001).


CONCLUSIONS
Neurorehabilitation therapists tend to ignore injury severity as factor in outcome unless encouraged to do so. Therapists accept personal responsibility for positive outcomes, but not for negative outcomes. Neurorehabilitation teams may benefit from education on factors affecting prognosis and attribution bias found in clinical practice.
Macciocchi
S N
SN
Department of Physical Medicine, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, USA.
Eaton
B
B
D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000534:rehabilitation; D002561:Cerebrovascular Disorders / Q000534:rehabilitation; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010469:Perceptual Distortion; D010810:Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; D011379:Prognosis; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000523:psychology; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D015599:Trauma Severity Indices; D016896:Treatment Outcome