title: Cognitive therapy.
abstract: The scientific approach advocated in CBT has increased its credibility with more biologically orientated therapists (who have remained sceptical of other psychodynamic models), making the approach acceptable to a broad group of psychiatrists. There is a rich clinical literature describing the techniques and applications of CBT in a wide variety of settings. The acquisition of a selection of the above texts offers a useful starting point, and scanning of major British and American psychiatry and psychology journals is likely to turn up at least one important paper every few months. Those with a commitment to research would benefit from subscribing to the journal Cognitive Therapy and Research. CBT does not aim to be a panacea for every disorder, and cognitive therapists are critical of its overzealous use by inadequately trained or poorly informed therapists. To practise effectively, the therapist needs a coherent cognitive model of the problem being treated and, as such, must explore the theoretical background literature and critically evaluate the data from process and outcome research. Hopefully, this 'scientist-practitioner' approach, tracing the emergence and development of the theory and principles of the model underpinning the therapy, means that cognitive therapists practise what they preach.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Scott
mesh_terms: D000342:Affective Symptoms / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans