The reversibility of airway obstruction to an inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agent is less satisfactory after methacholine testing in asthmatic subjects.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this work was to compare the response to an inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agent in two situations: (1) spontaneous airway obstruction in asthmatic subjects who had withheld treatment with the medication for more than 12 hs; and (2) after methacholine-induced airway obstruction once airway caliber had recovered to the premethacholine test value.


METHODS
Sixteen asthmatic subjects who showed a 20% or more improvement in FEV1 after inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agent (B2) (salbutamol, 200 micrograms) entered a double-blind crossover randomized trial in which the following tests were carried out: (1) FEV1 response after inhaling a placebo or active B2; (2) FEV1 response after inhaling a placebo or active B2 after a methacholine test that had induced a 20% or more reduction in FEV1, once FEV1 had recovered to the premethacholine value after inhaling salbutamol in an open fashion.


RESULTS
As expected, the mean percent improvement in FEV1 in the spontaneous airway obstruction situation was 21.7 +/- 8.5% after inhaling the active B2 and 2.2 +/- 1.8% after placebo B2 (p < 0.001). Following recovery after methacholine challenge, the FEV1 was slightly superior (mean difference of 146 mL) to the premethacholine value before inhaling the active or placebo B2. In this situation, the percent improvement in FEV1 after inhaling the active B2 was only 7.5 +/- 4.4% and not significantly different from after inhaling placebo B2 (4.9 +/- 5.4%). Consequently, the end FEV1 value after inhaling active B2 was significantly higher in a situation of spontaneous airway obstruction than after methacholine-induced airway obstruction (mean difference = 110 mL; p = 0.02).


CONCLUSIONS
After a methacholine test, the reversibility of an inhaled beta 2 agent is not significantly different from a placebo and is less satisfactory than in a situation of spontaneous airway obstruction. The mechanism for this needs to be explored but it is not secondary to persisting airway obstruction.
Malo
J L
JL
Department of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Montreal, Canada.
L'Archevêque
J
J
Ghezzo
H
H
Cartier
A
A
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000402:Airway Obstruction / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology; D000420:Albuterol / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001249:Asthma / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy*; D001985:Bronchial Provocation Tests; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D005541:Forced Expiratory Volume / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016210:Methacholine Chloride / Q000494:pharmacology; D008875:Middle Aged
D016210:Methacholine Chloride; D000420:Albuterol