Cost analysis of immunomagnetic marrow purging for neuroblastoma: in-house purging versus submission to purging centers.
High-dose chemoradiotherapy in conjunction with autologous bone marrow transplantation has been used in the treatment of advanced stage neuroblastoma. Because of frequent marrow involvement, marrow purging methods, such as the immunomagnetic technique, have been developed. Current cost constraints force institutions to consider in-house purging versus submission of marrow to purging centers. Our analysis demonstrates that 15 procedures per year are needed to justify an up-front investment in equipment and supplies with a break-even period of 5 years. This number is also required to keep technical proficiency current without frequent retraining of personnel. The analysis includes start-up costs for institutions without a bone marrow processing laboratory, as well as for institutions already processing marrow or peripheral blood stem cells. For institutions performing fewer procedures per year, submission of marrow to purging centers is more cost effective than in-housing purging.
Ross
R
R
Department of Pathology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
Jeter
E
E
Laver
J
J
D016465:Bone Marrow Purging / Q000191:economics*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D006699:Home Care Services / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D018189:Immunomagnetic Separation / Q000191:economics*; D009447:Neuroblastoma / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy*